The reading and lecture both discuss the need of having strong regulations to handle the coal ash. While the reading provides three explanation to support the idea that we do not need a new strong regulations, the professor refutes, saying none of these claims are convincing.
Firstly, the reading states that we already have strong regulations and many companies use liner to prvent any leaking. On the other hand, the professor questions this notion by saying that the rules that we already have are not sufficient. Moreover, liner has to be in each land full. This is because several old liners cost damage. For instance, the chemicals leaked to the ground and the drinking water contaminated. So, we need new strong regulation like the old one.
Secondly, the reading avers that the strong regulations might let the companies stop using the coal ash materials to produce other products. Also, many customers will stop buying these products. On the other hand, the professor questions this idea by pointing out that the companies will not stop using the recycle materials. For example, the mercury materials are very hazard and many companies saved it for fifty years with no concern. So, people will not stop buying these materials.
lastly, the reading states that using the strong regulations might increase the cost of handling coal ash materials. As a result, the electricity bill will increased for the whole community. Nevertheless, the professor contradicts this point by explaining that the strong regulations will increase the cost of handling the coal ash by one billion. On the other hand, the cost of the electricity bill will increase by just one dollar per month. So, we can so the math and protect the environment.
- TPO-50 - Integrated Writing Task 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To improve the quality of education, universities should spend money on salaries university professors. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO-25 - Integrated Writing Task In 1938 an archaeologist in Iraq acquired a set of clay jars that had been excavated two years earlier by villagers constructing a railroad line. The vessel was about 2,200 years old. Each clay jay contained a copper cylin 73
- TPO-45 Integrated Writing Task 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 198, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'regulation'?
Suggestion: regulation
...e idea that we do not need a new strong regulations, the professor refutes, saying none of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 222, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...ing that the rules that we already have are not sufficient. Moreover, liner has to ...
^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Lastly
...ill not stop buying these materials. lastly, the reading states that using the stro...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 157, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'increase'
Suggestion: increase
... As a result, the electricity bill will increased for the whole community. Nevertheless, ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, lastly, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, while, as to, for example, for instance, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1457.0 1373.03311258 106% => OK
No of words: 287.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07665505226 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6263550131 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.477351916376 0.540411800872 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 430.2 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.0937173737 49.2860985944 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.9444444444 110.228320801 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9444444444 21.698381199 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.38888888889 7.06452816374 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 4.33554083885 323% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325195402902 0.272083759551 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107542940887 0.0996497079465 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0975504539654 0.0662205650399 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201787523939 0.162205337803 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0541199006082 0.0443174109184 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.3589403974 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 53.8541721854 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.0289183223 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.42419426049 89% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.