The passage claims that there is no need of new regulations for handling and storing the waste product of burning coal, coal ash. On the other hand, the lecture contends the significance of strict regulations for safe environment. There are three reasons given by passage against which the lecture has casted doubts on and provided information.
First, according to the passage, it is said that there is existence of effective environmental regulations already. It also includes an example of linear special materials that prevents coal ash from leaking. Despite the existing regulations, the lecture explains these regulations are not sufficient. There are older landfills and disposal ponds where leakage has taken place resulting contamination of drinking water. Therefore, there has to be introduction of strict new regulations handling both older and newer disposal sites.
Second, the passage says that there has been concerns about recycling coal ash as they are used as concrete and bricks in construction sites. However, there won't be any issue in using the recycled coal as strict handling and disposal cannot apprehend the consumers. Even the example of mercury is given in the lecture to support the idea that recycled products will be used even after new regulations.
Third, it is sure that the increase in disposal will increases the handling costs too. But, the result will be overwhelming. The cost of the power companies will be worth 15 billion dollars. Hence, the average consumer household will increase by one percent. This little increment in price will be acceptable by the consumers for living in the safe environment. Hence, there won't be much price hike in electricity with increase in disposal. The passage claims that there is no need of new regulations for handling and storing the waste product of burning coal, coal ash. On the other hand, the lecture contends the significance of strict regulations for safe environment. There are three reasons given by passage against which the lecture has casted doubts on and provided information.
First, according to the passage, it is said that there is existence of effective environmental regulations already. It also includes an example of linear special materials that prevents coal ash from leaking. Despite the existing regulations, the lecture explains these regulations are not sufficient. There are older landfills and disposal ponds where leakage has taken place resulting contamination of drinking water. Therefore, there has to be introduction of strict new regulations handling both older and newer disposal sites.
Second, the passage says that there has been concerns about recycling coal ash as they are used as concrete and bricks in construction sites. However, there won't be any issue in using the recycled coal as strict handling and disposal cannot apprehend the consumers. Even the example of mercury is given in the lecture to support the idea that recycled products will be used even after new regulations.
Third, it is sure that the increase in disposal will increases the handling costs too. But, the result will be overwhelming. The cost of the power companies will be worth 15 billion dollars. Hence, the average consumer household will increase by one percent. This little increment in price will be acceptable by the consumers for living in the safe environment. Hence, there won't be much price hike in electricity with increase in disposal.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 54, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'increase'
Suggestion: increase
...sure that the increase in disposal will increases the handling costs too. But, the result...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 54, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'increase'
Suggestion: increase
...sure that the increase in disposal will increases the handling costs too. But, the result...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, second, so, therefore, third, as to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 34.0 10.4613686534 325% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 5.04856512141 317% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 30.3222958057 204% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 18.0 5.01324503311 359% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2914.0 1373.03311258 212% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 550.0 270.72406181 203% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29818181818 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.84273464058 4.04702891845 120% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79101273127 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.276363636364 0.540411800872 51% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 905.4 419.366225166 216% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 14.0 8.23620309051 170% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 34.0 13.0662251656 260% => Too many sentences.
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.7608917774 49.2860985944 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 85.7058823529 110.228320801 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1764705882 21.698381199 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.70588235294 7.06452816374 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.09492273731 171% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 4.33554083885 415% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.27373068433 281% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.454996664528 0.272083759551 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128489538353 0.0996497079465 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10529619186 0.0662205650399 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.274190154513 0.162205337803 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.059221678525 0.0443174109184 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.3589403974 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.55 8.42419426049 78% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.