tpo 43
The material discusses the concept of the way that agnostics ate and behave. While the reading details certain looks at the topic from one perspective, the listening challenges certain point outlined in the reading passage.
Firstly, the reading details some points in regard to this topic, namely they agnostics might be swimming predators. In addition to that, they might be seafloor dwellers. One last point, the possibility they were parasites.
Conversely, the listening challenges the points. One specific contradiction is that arthropods predators have large eyes with strong vision, in order to be able to catch small animals. While agnostics’ eyes were so poor, they were almost blind so that could not be predators. Next, agnostics were not seafloor dwellers, because they move pretty fast and spread across large distance, while that highly usual for seafloor dwellers which move very slow and occupy small area. Finally, usually the parasites populations are small, but the agnostids had a great size population; thus this theory is not possible too.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-22 | sonyeoso | 80 | view |
| 2023-02-24 | m.ghoroobi | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-20 | m.ghoroobi | view | |
| 2022-09-03 | Allenwlh | 70 | view |
| 2022-04-16 | lhklin | 75 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...point outlined in the reading passage. Firstly, the reading details some points...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., the possibility they were parasites. Conversely, the listening challenges the...
^^^
Line 3, column 621, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...; thus this theory is not possible too.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, finally, first, firstly, if, look, so, thus, well, while, in addition, in regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 30.3222958057 36% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 905.0 1373.03311258 66% => OK
No of words: 167.0 270.72406181 62% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41916167665 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 4.04702891845 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66657403594 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 145.348785872 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.652694610778 0.540411800872 121% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 419.366225166 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.8555226201 49.2860985944 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.5 110.228320801 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7 21.698381199 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06452816374 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243800525562 0.272083759551 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.08886615292 0.0996497079465 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0570878612611 0.0662205650399 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141458398378 0.162205337803 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0885803631893 0.0443174109184 200% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.3589403974 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.86 12.2367328918 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 63.6247240618 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.