TPO 43
Actually, both the passage and the lecture comment about a special extinct animal which its fossils have been discovered in stones in hundreds of wide areas. the researchers have been detected that the animal called agnostid was a kind of arthropod. Although the passage brings three hypothesizes for illustrating the agnostids' lifestyle the lecturer puts those theories under question. According to professor's statements, none of the hypothesizes are convincing.
First, as the passage expressed since agnostids are counted as arthropods, they might be swimming predators which fed on a vast range of other organisms. The man; however, refutes the claim by emphasizing the fact that such predators had large eyes; whereas, the agnostids sometimes was blind; besides, they didn't have any other sensitive organs in order to use them instead of huge eyes.
Next, as declared in the article, they presumably survive by eating dead organism and bacteria on the seafloor; nonetheless, the speaker dismisses the idea by indicating the fact that arthropods which are survived by such manners move slow and their location of living is so restricted. The agnostids fossils have been found in many places which are located far from each other that proves the fact that they were enabled to travel long distance by a considerable speed.
Finally, the passage sets forth that agnostids were parasites; in other words, their foods were larger animals. Nevertheless, the professor doesn't reinforce the theory by adding the though that the agnostids lived in a large population in comparison with parasites which preferred to be in a limited group.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-22 | sonyeoso | 80 | view |
| 2023-02-24 | m.ghoroobi | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-20 | m.ghoroobi | view | |
| 2022-09-03 | Allenwlh | 70 | view |
| 2022-04-16 | lhklin | 75 | view |
- fine lines could not represent that the dinosaur had feather. The lecturer, nonetheless, refutes the author's explanations by offering three counterclaims.First, the passage posits that after dying, the animal's skin might have decomposed into f 83
- TPO 50 - do you disagree with the statement or agree? all the university students should require to take history courses no matter what their field is. use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? young people today have no inflience on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole. use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 80
- TPO 49 Writing IntegratedLike many creatures, humpback whales migrate long distances for feeding and mating purposes. How animals manage to migrate long distances is often puzzling. In the case of humpback whales, we may have found the answer: they may be 90
- TOEFL T P O 46 - Integrated Writing Task 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 159, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ed in stones in hundreds of wide areas. the researchers have been detected that the...
^^^
Line 5, column 309, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...tids sometimes was blind; besides, they didnt have any other sensitive organs in orde...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 141, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...er animals. Nevertheless, the professor doesnt reinforce the theory by adding the thou...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, besides, finally, first, however, if, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, whereas, kind of, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1390.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 259.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3667953668 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75660534068 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6138996139 0.540411800872 114% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.5182086865 49.2860985944 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.0 110.228320801 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9 21.698381199 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1 7.06452816374 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.395467631651 0.272083759551 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146349968624 0.0996497079465 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.074269824974 0.0662205650399 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227329539639 0.162205337803 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.028346719616 0.0443174109184 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.3589403974 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.8541721854 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.2367328918 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.42419426049 114% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 63.6247240618 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.