The reading and the lecturer are both about ancient European silver coin, which is brought up by European explorers known as Norse in the state of Maine in the Unites State. The author of reading believes that the coin has no historical evidence but fake one. The lecturer casts doubt on the claim made in the article. She thinks that the coin is a genuine piece of historical evidence.
First of all, the author points out that the coin has no real connection with Norse settlements. It is mentioned that European explorers Norse settlement have been discovered in far eastern Canada which is thousands kilometer far from Mine site. This point is challenged by the lecturer. She says that not only the coin but other object found in the Maine site which have come from far. Furthermore, she argues that the native American who lived in the Maine site have travel to north American and they were interested in obtaining objects from far away distances.
Secondly, the author contends that no other coin found. The article notes that Norse did not bring any silver coin to their settlements. The lecturer rebuts this argument. She suggests that not necessary to find other silver coin. She elaborates this by mentioning that European explorer didn’t come permanent they brought silver coins and other valuable objects and they took them back to Europe.
Finally, the author state that Norse understood the silver coin is useless in North America. The article establishes that Norse would have known that North America did not recognize silver coins as money. The lecturer, on the other hand, posits that native north America like unusual and beautiful things. He puts forth the idea that Norse had brought silver coins to North America as a beautiful object.
In conclusion, the lecturer effectively casts doubt on all the claims and theories present in the reading.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 261, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...as no historical evidence but fake one. The lecturer casts doubt on the claim made ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, if, second, secondly, in conclusion, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 12.0772626932 157% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1566.0 1373.03311258 114% => OK
No of words: 313.0 270.72406181 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00319488818 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40381314396 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495207667732 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 478.8 419.366225166 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.1836113166 49.2860985944 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.4210526316 110.228320801 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4736842105 21.698381199 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36842105263 7.06452816374 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.58980209986 0.272083759551 217% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.184494467968 0.0996497079465 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106039997824 0.0662205650399 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.289854691619 0.162205337803 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.153678131288 0.0443174109184 347% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.3589403974 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.42419426049 87% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.