e reading and lecture both discuss if the coins that found in native america is a genuine or not. While the reading provides three claims to support that these coins are a genuine, the professor refutes, saying that none of these claims are convincing.
Firstly, the reading avers that the long distance between native american and Canada where the coins were located ensure that these coins are fake. However, the professor argues this notion by saying that these coins could not be fake because there are many objects found in north America came from long distance. So, these coins might be came from Canada. In addition, the native american traveled for long distance and they were interested in many objects. Furthermore, they brought many objects back with them.
In addition, the article shows that they did not find any other coins at Canadian site that inhibited by the Norse. So, these coins could not be a genuine. On the other hand, the professor argues this idea by pointing out that it was not necessary to find another objects to confirm that these coins were real. This is because the Norse did not stay permanent and they took these coins back with them. In fact, The Norse brought the coins to native American and when they back to Europe the took it with them.
Lastly, the reading mentions that the Norse thought that these coins were not important. So, they could not know that these coins used as money. Nevertheless, the professor rejects this idea by explaining that many Norse people were attracted to many objects, In addition, these coins were very nice and they were look like jewelers. As a result, Norse used these coins to trade with Europe.
- TOEFL T P O 43 - Integrated Writing Task 3
- TOEFL T P O 34 - Integrated Writing Task 3
- TPO-44 - Independent Writing Task Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Others believe that it is best to use that time doing th 70
- TPO 27 integrated writing Little ice age 75
- TPO 38 Integrated writing 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: E
e reading and lecture both discuss if the...
^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ought many objects back with them. In addition, the article shows that they...
^^^
Line 7, column 146, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[1]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...the Norse. So, these coins could not be a genuine. On the other hand, the professor argue...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, lastly, look, nevertheless, so, while, in addition, in fact, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 22.412803532 187% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1396.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 289.0 270.72406181 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83044982699 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.1358536156 2.5805825403 83% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.446366782007 0.540411800872 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 427.5 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.7147661456 49.2860985944 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.25 110.228320801 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0625 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.3125 7.06452816374 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.381968271117 0.272083759551 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.166122983991 0.0996497079465 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0604913391426 0.0662205650399 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.258237530514 0.162205337803 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.074418344806 0.0443174109184 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.3589403974 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.2367328918 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.26 8.42419426049 86% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 63.6247240618 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.