According to the reading passage, there are three possible reasons to show that the discovered coin is not genuine historical evidence from the people who came from Europe termly Norse. While, the lecturer founds it not convincing at all and most of the researchers strongly believe that the coin belongs to Norse, subsequently, call it a reasonable historic evidence. Then, the professor provides that there exist three reasons supporting her idea.
First, the author asserts that the coin has found in the state of Maine in United States where is too far from the first settlement of Norse. On contrary, the professor repudiates the declaration by illustrating that Norse people did not stay in a same place, but they traveled long distance along the North America. As a result, Norse could reach far-fetched places and many of other objects have found belonging to Norse as the coin in their way of travel.
Second, the text avers that any other coin has not been found in the region. The lecturer, however, does not acknowledge the claim by saying that Norse brought silver coins with themselves to North America and took them back again to Europe. Accordingly, Norse were not necessarily permanent inhabitants in North America and packed their coins to ship to Europe again.
Third, although the writer holds the opinion that Norse understood that silver coins were not valued among Americans. Contrarily, the speaker disapproves the assertion by demonstrating that native Americans valued the coins. To put her idea forward, she explains that the silver coins were appealing for the native Americans for their beauty. Consequently, the people liked them for their jewelries like necklaces. Therefore, the European started to trade with them using coins which reveals that the coins were available in North America, too.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, consequently, first, however, second, so, then, therefore, third, while, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1535.0 1373.03311258 112% => OK
No of words: 296.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18581081081 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58473766388 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 145.348785872 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584459459459 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.7251929324 49.2860985944 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.642857143 110.228320801 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1428571429 21.698381199 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.28571428571 7.06452816374 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.544604290172 0.272083759551 200% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.169812392304 0.0996497079465 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0760133634741 0.0662205650399 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.304874493245 0.162205337803 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0424142662945 0.0443174109184 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.3589403974 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 63.6247240618 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.