TPO 44 - Integrated Writing Task

Essay topics:

TPO 44 - Integrated Writing Task

The reading passage suggests three reasons why some archaeologists think the European silver coin found in the United States is a fake rather than a historical remain. However, the lecturer disagrees with the statement and offers three arguments.
Firstly, although the coin was far away from the place where a Norse stayed in North America, it doesn't mean that the Native Americans could not move such a long distance to the Norse settlement and brought it back. The lecturer argues that there were other objects that were found as an evidence to show that the Natives traveled around and carried cargos back to the inhabitant.
Second, the writer claims that there were no other coins found in Norse settlement. On the other hand, the lecturer refutes this point and disputes that the Norse did not live in North America forever. They traveled to the State and went back to Europe. There is a possibility that the Norse brought abundant silver coins to the state, and then packed all of them when they headed back to Europe.
Last but not the least, even though the native Americans did not use the silver coins as money, the Norse still could trade with them only if the native people were interested in those beautiful coins. The native made use of the sparkling and shiny coins to make jewelry such as necklace.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 98, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ere a Norse stayed in North America, it doesnt mean that the Native Americans could no...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, second, so, still, then, such as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1092.0 1373.03311258 80% => OK
No of words: 228.0 270.72406181 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78947368421 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25482963755 2.5805825403 87% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 145.348785872 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561403508772 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 336.6 419.366225166 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.0965158932 49.2860985944 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.2 110.228320801 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8 21.698381199 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06452816374 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.443529226101 0.272083759551 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.165487318219 0.0996497079465 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.093079533801 0.0662205650399 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.258356672353 0.162205337803 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.024088368643 0.0443174109184 54% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 12.2367328918 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 63.6247240618 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.