TPO 45
The reading and lecture discuss the discovery of very old fossil structures that resemble bee nests and belong to 200 million years ago. The passage presents three skeptics for why this structure doesn't relate to bees. Whereas, the professor refutes all of the reasons by pointing out his explanation.
First, the passage asserts that the earliest Bees' fossil doesn't have that age; indeed, it has been found about 100 million years ago. However, the professor argues against this idea because although this idea about the earliest bees' fossil is true, maybe there wasn't a suitable condition before that time for bees' fossil to preserve. Indeed, this may because of the lack of resins in that period's trees.
Second, the reading states there were no flowering plants in that period; thus, bees couldn't exist in the lack of them because of bees and flowering plants mutually dependent on each other. However, the lecturer disagrees with this idea and believes earlier bees may not dependent on flowering plants. In other words, they may feed on non-flowering plants like pine trees, etc.
Third, the reading states that the structures of discovered fossilized nests lack some fine details such as a spiral cap that is different from modern bees' nests. However, the professor denies this reason strongly, because although they didn't have spiral caps, there chemical evidence that they used similar waterproofed substances for building their nests. Thus, the structure relates to Bees for sure.
Although the reading presents three skeptics to dispute the opinion that the founded structure doesn't belong to bees, the professor in the lecture believes none of them are convincing.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 197, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...s three skeptics for why this structure doesnt relate to bees. Whereas, the professor ...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 220, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...y this structure doesnt relate to bees. Whereas, the professor refutes all of the reaso...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 251, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...to bees. Whereas, the professor refutes all of the reasons by pointing out his explanation...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 58, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...e asserts that the earliest Bees fossil doesnt have that age; indeed, it has been foun...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 229, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'bees'' or 'bee's'?
Suggestion: bees'; bee's
...e although this idea about the earliest bees fossil is true, maybe there wasnt a sui...
^^^^
Line 3, column 262, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
...rliest bees fossil is true, maybe there wasnt a suitable condition before that time f...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 86, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...ering plants in that period; thus, bees couldnt exist in the lack of them because of be...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 157, Rule ID: MUTUALLY_DEPENDENT_ON_EACH_OTHER[1]
Message: Use simply 'mutually dependent'.
Suggestion: mutually dependent
...em because of bees and flowering plants mutually dependent on each other. However, the lecturer disagrees with t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 378, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n-flowering plants like pine trees, etc. Third, the reading states that the struc...
^^^^
Line 7, column 238, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
... reason strongly, because although they didnt have spiral caps, there chemical eviden...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 96, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... the opinion that the founded structure doesnt belong to bees, the professor in the le...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, second, so, third, thus, whereas, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1415.0 1373.03311258 103% => OK
No of words: 270.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24074074074 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34962274064 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540740740741 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 407.7 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.1025388653 49.2860985944 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.846153846 110.228320801 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7692307692 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.30769230769 7.06452816374 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 4.19205298013 262% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0911663182379 0.272083759551 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0389423850761 0.0996497079465 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0220343767603 0.0662205650399 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.052329308129 0.162205337803 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0220002404023 0.0443174109184 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.3589403974 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.