TPO 45 integrated writing
The reading discusses that many skeptics are doubtful that the structures that have been discovered in the state of Arizona were generated by bees. The author listed three factors to support this idea. However, the speaker finds all the ideas unconvincing and presents some evidence to refute all of them.
First, the author proposes that no fossil remained from bees to prove this fact. On the contrary, the speaker rejects this theory and declares that it is true that there are not any fossils but it might have some reasons like tree resin were rare and they came much later or no trees produced kind of resin material.
Second, the author argues that flowering plants appeared 125 million years old ago and bees could not live without them because they have a close relationship. In contrast, the author casts doubt on this issue by standing that early bees fed on non-flowering plants like pine trees. After a long time, they make a strong connection with flowering plants and begin to feed on them.
Last but not least, the reading passage points out that the fossilized structure does not have sufficient finer details. On the other hand, the speaker rebuts this idea and states that chemical evidence has proved that the chamber has been built by proofreading material like some kind of the materials that have been used by modern bees. Therefore the speaker rejects all ideas.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-28 | sonyeoso | 80 | view |
| 2022-04-12 | lhklin | 70 | view |
| 2022-04-12 | lhklin | 70 | view |
| 2021-11-15 | mbamatters | 85 | view |
| 2021-09-10 | parsaramezan | 70 | view |
- stone balls 71
- TPO 51 47
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?If people have the opportunity to get a secure job, they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 80
- TPO 42 integrated writing 75
- TPO50 integrated writing 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 11, column 340, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...als that have been used by modern bees. Therefore the speaker rejects all ideas.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, second, so, therefore, in contrast, kind of, it is true, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1163.0 1373.03311258 85% => OK
No of words: 236.0 270.72406181 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92796610169 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29559362079 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601694915254 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 346.5 419.366225166 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.7286799719 49.2860985944 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.727272727 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4545454545 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1818181818 7.06452816374 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125697254779 0.272083759551 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0476912227923 0.0996497079465 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0184401944843 0.0662205650399 28% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.076383545112 0.162205337803 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0170325115047 0.0443174109184 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.