tpo 46
The lecture and the reading both discuss the method of medical information recorded. On the first hand the reading sates that records in electronic databases has several advantages. On the other hand, the lecture refutes this, by saying the argument mentioned in the passage does no significant true and they use it like an emergency back up.
First of all, the reading claims that electronic records can help reduce costs. However, the lecture argues the doctor usually discontinue the recording use the electronic medical system, and they still using the pen and paper to write the patients records so they still pay for record cost.
In addition, the reading makes the argument is that electronic medical records preventing errors. The lecture counter this point by saying that the doctors still using the pen and paper then they still do the same mistakes on poor writing.
The reading passage argues that electronic medical records can greatly aid medical research. The lecture refutes this claim by pointing out that the doctors must folow a strict and complicated constructions make it private in the united states. Also, patients absolutly can make block the acces of their records.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-30 | sonyeoso | 80 | view |
| 2021-09-27 | afgmar | 70 | view |
| 2021-08-12 | yasamiamirreza | 70 | view |
| 2021-04-22 | mahi22 | 80 | view |
| 2020-11-14 | Masoome shahsavari | 70 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 94, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...cords can greatly aid medical research. The lecture refutes this claim by pointing ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, so, still, then, in addition, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 10.4613686534 10% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 30.3222958057 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1008.0 1373.03311258 73% => OK
No of words: 194.0 270.72406181 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19587628866 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 4.04702891845 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45267677026 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 145.348785872 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546391752577 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 303.3 419.366225166 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4851698858 49.2860985944 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.8 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 21.698381199 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.7 7.06452816374 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.434538338702 0.272083759551 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.193224219607 0.0996497079465 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.14559297338 0.0662205650399 220% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.286618530896 0.162205337803 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109950671896 0.0443174109184 248% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.3589403974 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 63.6247240618 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.