tpo 46: Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage.
The article and the lecture are both about the use of electronic records for doctors. the author of the reading thinks that electronic records are beneficial for physician and provides three reasons of support. The lecturer challenges the statements made by the author. He is uncertain if these records are beneficial to doctors or not.
First of all, the author claims that the use of electronic medical records can help to reduce the cost of storing and transferring paper records. The professor, however, argues that the cost reduction is not significant. She believes that doctors will not throw the paper medical records they have. Moreover, they will save them for the purpose of medical investigations, or to use them in case of emergency. As a result, doctors still need to pay the cost for keeping their paper medical records.
Secondly, the writer suggests that electronic medical records will help to prevent the occurrence of medical errors. This statement is challenged by the speaker. She argues that doctors will keep using pens and papers to take notes and write their prescriptions by hand. In addition, the professor explains that the staff members working in the doctor's office are the ones who register all the information in the electronic medical records, not the doctors. Therefore, they may misinterpret the information provided by doctors causing medical errors.
Finally, it is mentioned in the article that electronic record can help researches in gathering the information they need for their studies. The professor, on the other hand, posits that electronic records are arduous to access and use. Moreover, they are subjected to law restrictions that aim to keep patient privacy. Researchers have to follow a strict procedure to access patient electronic records. Furthermore, researchers are sometimes required to ask for the patients' permissions to access their information, which sometimes is refused by patients.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-16 | Manjushree | 3 | view |
| 2019-11-25 | Qwe | 3 | view |
| 2019-11-25 | Qwe | 3 | view |
| 2019-11-24 | Qwe | 70 | view |
| 2019-11-07 | derakhshani4476 | 3 | view |
- TPO45:Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge specific points made in the reading passage. 3
- TPO 37.Do you agree or disagree with the following statements？ Because people are busy doing so many different things, they do very few things well. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO 49: Summarize the points made in the lecture about humpback whales, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific methods proposed in the reading passage 73
- tpo 46: Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage. 73
- TPO48: Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific methods proposed in the reading passage 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 87, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
... use of electronic records for doctors. the author of the reading thinks that elect...
^^^
Line 5, column 346, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'doctors'' or 'doctor's'?
Suggestion: doctors'; doctor's
...s that the staff members working in the doctors office are the ones who register all th...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 441, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ation in the electronic medical records, not the doctors. Therefore, they may mis...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, in addition, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1647.0 1373.03311258 120% => OK
No of words: 308.0 270.72406181 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3474025974 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84770245278 2.5805825403 110% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487012987013 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 501.3 419.366225166 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.9240569048 49.2860985944 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.6842105263 110.228320801 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2105263158 21.698381199 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.10526315789 7.06452816374 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.514853389915 0.272083759551 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160375075664 0.0996497079465 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110611324209 0.0662205650399 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.318183674384 0.162205337803 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0698638908612 0.0443174109184 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.3589403974 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 63.6247240618 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.