tpo 46 using electronic medical records rather than paper-based records
The material discusses the approach of storing patients' information in electronic databases rather tham paper-based records. While the reading mentions that using electronic records have many virtues, the listening challenges this and states that all these benefits are uncertain.
First, the author posits that implementing electronic record can save money. On the other hand, the professor opposes this and says that this benefit is not significant as the reading mentioned. The lecturer explains that doctors who adopt electronic medica records could not discontinue paper records. The speaker adds that they still use paper-based records as a backup for legal purposes. As a result, the lecturer contends that adapting to electronic medical records, people will stil have to pay the cost that related to the paper records.
Second, the reading states that using electronic medical records could reduce errors related to doctors' poor handwriting. On the contrary, the lecturer refutes this and points out that most doctors still use pen and paper when they chek their patients to take notes. in addition to that, the professor adds that other medical stuffs take these notes and inter them to the computer. therefore, the speaker explains that using this approch will still lead to the same errors related to poor handwriting.
Third, the writer mentions that using electronic medical records could help medical research. Conversely, the speaker contradicts this and states that research still finds it difficult to access electronic patients' information. The professor explains that in the US, there is a strict privacy law, so patients could keep their record private. Furthermore, the lecturer adds that researchers should follow many strict procedures to get permission to access patients' information. The listening states that patients could block their records from others rather than their medical treatments.
- do you agree or disagree with the following statment When teachers assign projects on which students must work together the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on a projects Use a specific reasons and examples to su 72
- TPO-47 - Integrated Writing Task Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs. Many pterosaurs were very large, some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters. Paleontologists have long wondered 37
- Some people believe that the best way of learning about life is by listening to the advice of family and friends. Other people believe that the best way of learning about life is through personal experience. Which do you prefer? 70
- the world is changed quickly, people in the past were happier and satisfied than they are today 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The food we eat today is much healthier than in the past. 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 268, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...they chek their patients to take notes. in addition to that, the professor adds th...
^^
Line 5, column 383, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
...e notes and inter them to the computer. therefore, the speaker explains that using this a...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 207, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'patients'' or 'patient's'?
Suggestion: patients'; patient's
...finds it difficult to access electronic patients information. The professor explains tha...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ather than their medical treatments.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, furthermore, if, second, so, still, therefore, third, while, in addition, as a result, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.4613686534 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 12.0772626932 166% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 22.412803532 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 19.0 30.3222958057 63% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1639.0 1373.03311258 119% => OK
No of words: 293.0 270.72406181 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59385665529 5.08290768461 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6091966017 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491467576792 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 476.1 419.366225166 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 16.0 8.23620309051 194% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.249172778 49.2860985944 43% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 102.4375 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3125 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 7.06452816374 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.49441527282 0.272083759551 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.175216250797 0.0996497079465 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106211366774 0.0662205650399 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.31775763303 0.162205337803 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.052441781216 0.0443174109184 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.2367328918 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 63.6247240618 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.