TPO- 47
The reading and lecture both talk about pterosaurs and about that they could flight or not. Pterosaurs lived alongside the dinosaurs. They were big and had wings. The author suggests that they could not fly because of three reasons; however, the professor states that the arguments are not strong enough.
At first, they discuss about cold-blood. The reading claims that pterosaurs were probably cold-blooded and they had a slow metabolism. So they could not produce a lot of energy for flight. The speaker, on the other hand, says that pterosaurs had a hair covering that covered them in low temperture and made them be like warm-blooded.
Secondly, the reading and lecture talk about the weight of pterosaurs. The writer argues that pterosaurs, because of their heavy weight can not flight. In contrast, the professor states that pterosaurs were hollow so they were not be too heavy and they would have been able to flight.
Finally, the article and speech discuss about the power of take of. The reading suggests that all flyer animal should take off from ground and then fly like birds. Fro this ability they should have strong legs. But pterosaurs did not have a strong back leg muscles. Nevertheless, the lecturer says that pterosaurs used their four legs for walking. So they could run as fast enough and jump.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-08-22 | masoudmonirian | 61 | view |
- tpo-32- Summarise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage. 65
- TPO- 47 61
- tpo-32- Summaries the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage. 65
- Which one do you prefer Living in rural areas or in cities 81
- to-44- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the specific theories presented in the reading passage. 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The reading and lecture both talk about ...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the arguments are not strong enough. At first, they discuss about cold-blood....
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e and made them be like warm-blooded. Secondly, the reading and lecture talk a...
^^^
Line 3, column 127, Rule ID: HEAVY_WEIGHT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'heavyweight'?
Suggestion: heavyweight
...rgues that pterosaurs, because of their heavy weight can not flight. In contrast, the profes...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 235, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...pterosaurs were hollow so they were not be too heavy and they would have been able...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d they would have been able to flight. Finally, the article and speech discuss ...
^^^
Line 4, column 167, Rule ID: FOR_FRO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'for'?
Suggestion: For
...ff from ground and then fly like birds. Fro this ability they should have strong le...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, then, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1099.0 1373.03311258 80% => OK
No of words: 222.0 270.72406181 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95045045045 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4344544482 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 145.348785872 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540540540541 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 309.6 419.366225166 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 21.2450331126 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.0712571714 49.2860985944 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 64.6470588235 110.228320801 59% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.0588235294 21.698381199 60% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06452816374 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.27373068433 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.390441865521 0.272083759551 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125326490909 0.0996497079465 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0763778605491 0.0662205650399 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.242547352295 0.162205337803 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0537655496504 0.0443174109184 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.4 13.3589403974 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.2 53.8541721854 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 11.0289183223 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.54 12.2367328918 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.98 8.42419426049 83% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 63.6247240618 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.498013245 69% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.2008830022 62% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.