In this set of materials, in the reading passage discusses that the Pterosaurs that lived aline the period of dinosaurs lived on the Earth. But provide some reasons that these dinosaurs had not the ability of flying. While, in the listening, the professor casts doubt on what is presented in the text and believes that some recent evidence substantiated that Pterosaurs could capability of flying.
First of all, in the text, it is clearly mentioned that these animals were same other reptiles cold-blooded some of them had not the metabolism range that required to support energy needed for flying. However, the professor claims that these animals were typically worm -blooded and they had the faster rate of metabolism which could support flying.
In addition, the professor disagrees with this idea that the high weight of this animals could create the limitation for flying. She points out that, these animals had special anatomic features that decreased significantly their weight. This animals instead of airbornes had hollow bones that led to they became light enough in weight to could fly.
Finally, yet importantly, in the text, it is stated that Pterosaurs could not able to take off from the ground. The professor subscribes that it is true that these animals had not behind legs to help them for taking off but they used four limbs to push them. They trough used this limbs could run fast and jump enough to can fly.
- Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they already know how to do well. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO 26 76
- To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors. 61
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 265, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'wormed'.
Suggestion: wormed
...laims that these animals were typically worm -blooded and they had the faster rate o...
^^^^
Line 3, column 77, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... with this idea that the high weight of this animals could create the limitation for...
^^^^
Line 3, column 237, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: These
...t decreased significantly their weight. This animals instead of airbornes had hollow...
^^^^
Line 3, column 318, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: enough
...low bones that led to they became light enough in weight to could fly. Finally, yet importantly...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 276, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ur limbs to push them. They trough used this limbs could run fast and jump enough to...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, so, while, in addition, first of all, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 22.412803532 165% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1193.0 1373.03311258 87% => OK
No of words: 240.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97083333333 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43438547459 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 145.348785872 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520833333333 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 351.9 419.366225166 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.916393454 49.2860985944 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.454545455 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8181818182 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.45454545455 7.06452816374 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209520483285 0.272083759551 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0846746976033 0.0996497079465 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0402571405074 0.0662205650399 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12771079124 0.162205337803 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0406400664365 0.0443174109184 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 63.6247240618 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.