TPO-47 Integrated writing

Essay topics:

TPO-47 Integrated writing

Reading and lecture are about possibility of powered flight by Pterasaurs. Reading put forth arguments that these dinosaurs are not well functioned to fly. While, lecture argues these points by proving following reasons:

First, reading states that pterosaurs are not able to produce enough energy required for flying due to low metabolism of these cold-blooded species. While lecture cast doubt on this statement. She suggests that there is couple of evidences from fossil that they possess dense like covering which is responsible for generating heat inside their bodies irrespective of cold atmosphere outside. In addition, she points out these pterosaurs have high metabolism require for flying.

Second, reading mentions that being large and heavy these pterosaurs are incapable to fly. On the other hand, professor says that it is discovered that their anatomical structure contains hollow bones, which are light in weight, and refutes point make in reading. Furthermore, she thinks that they can efficiently fly with low weight and flapping their wings.

Third, reading implies that lack of strong musculature in their back leg muscles reduces chances for them to take off like birds. On the other hand, lecture denies that, she says unlike birds that only use legs to run and jump, but pterosaurs have more potential as they use all fours limbs like bats to run fast and develop momentum to fly. As a consequence lecture successfully casts doubt on points made in reading

Votes
Average: 8.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-02-07 Taniazehra 81 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 150, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...tabolism of these cold-blooded species. While lecture cast doubt on this statement. S...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 213, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: light
...ucture contains hollow bones, which are light in weight, and refutes point make in reading. Fur...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 343, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...o run fast and develop momentum to fly. As a consequence lecture successfully cast...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, second, so, third, well, while, in addition, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1254.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 237.0 270.72406181 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29113924051 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55590347252 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64135021097 0.540411800872 119% => OK
syllable_count: 373.5 419.366225166 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 0.0 8.23620309051 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.252801554 49.2860985944 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.5 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 7.06452816374 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28171886368 0.272083759551 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0953070951511 0.0996497079465 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589783302044 0.0662205650399 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157064697933 0.162205337803 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0568238749141 0.0443174109184 128% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.