The reading and the lecture are both about how to solve the problem of frog distinction. The author of the reading proposes three solutions of this problem. In the lecture the professor casts doubt on each solutions made by the author.
First, the lecturer states that prohibiting pesticide is unfair. She says that this will lead to a big loss in farmers craps which consequently will decrease their yield. This opposes the solution made in the lecture that prohibiting pesticides will help overcome the problem of frog extinction.
Secondly, the professor points out that there are many drawbacks of treating frogs with antifungal individually and persistently. Initially she mentions that it will be unpractical and hard to treat every frog species. Moreover, this treatment should be done on every generation; and that will make the treatment even more complicated and expensive. This disputes the second suggestion made by the author of the article that if frogs receive effective antifungal medication that will prevent them from dying due to infections.
Finally, the lecture puts forth the idea that global warming is the main cause of frog extinction not the natural habitats water. Because of this protecting lakes and will not help decrease the number of frog spices that extinct every year.
In conclusion the professor thinks that the solutions provided in the reading are not practical. She effectively challenged every claims made in the lecture.
- The article and the lecture are both discussing about the decline in frogs population. The reading claims that this phenomenon could be prevented, and explains three method for it. The professor dismisses all methods by saying that none of methods could p 81
- TPO-16 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- TOEFL T P O 22 Integrated Writing Task 85
- knowledge 76
- TPO-25 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 71
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1240.0 1373.03311258 90% => OK
No of words: 234.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29914529915 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71395449132 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 372.6 419.366225166 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.2749492243 49.2860985944 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.5714285714 110.228320801 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7142857143 21.698381199 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.64285714286 7.06452816374 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237846752683 0.272083759551 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0875947332477 0.0996497079465 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0694149815751 0.0662205650399 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130497259333 0.162205337803 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0861646837924 0.0443174109184 194% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.3589403974 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.