TPO 50 integrated
In this set of materials, the reading passage talk about possibility of sending humans to mars in coming decades and the listening passage talk about the same issue.
According to the reading passage scientist believe that life in the mars is impossible and provide tree reason to prove their point. The first reason is that a round trip to mars and return to the earth took two years and they don’t have enough food and water to survive there. The second reason is that mars gravity is zero and their body and bones don’t tolerate this gravity and can make some serous problem for them and the last reason is that a radiation in the mars is in the dangerous level and mars don’t have magnetic field like earth to protect the human from solar radiations.
The reading passage talk about some solution about the argument in the reading passage. The first of this solution is that all the astronauts can use the hydroponic technics to grow plant in the water in the space. this technics have a lot of advantage for them one of them is the plant can convert the dirty water to clear water and they can convert the carbon dioxide to oxygen therefore the first approach of the reading passage is proved unconvincing. The second, they can eat the calcium in the space to decrease the harm to their body, so the writers second idea rebutted. Third, they space radiation is different in the space some area have low radiation and others have more, so, they can remind in the places that have low radiation and create shelter for them that have little weight, thus the last argument in the reading passage retorted.
To sum it all up by taking all the detail in to consideration, the listening passage provide some solution for problems that reading passage argued and prove that life in the mars is possible for humans.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-14 | Iman karim | 57 | view |
| 2022-10-22 | porteghale Abiasli | view | |
| 2022-09-01 | Allenwlh | 70 | view |
| 2022-03-29 | Hibahtabbaa | 70 | view |
| 2022-02-25 | parsaramezan | 70 | view |
- TPO 36: Question: Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they respond to the specific points made in the reading passage. 3
- TPO 38 3
- TPO 40.Some parents offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school. Do you think this is a good idea? 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In the past, it was easier to identify what type of career job would lead to a secure, successful future. (TPO39-Task2) 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television has destroyed communication among friends and family. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ect the human from solar radiations. The reading passage talk about some solutio...
^^^
Line 5, column 89, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ut the argument in the reading passage. The first of this solution is that all the ...
^^^
Line 5, column 216, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...o grow plant in the water in the space. this technics have a lot of advantage for th...
^^^^
Line 5, column 216, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...o grow plant in the water in the space. this technics have a lot of advantage for th...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, therefore, third, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 7.30242825607 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 30.3222958057 142% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1513.0 1373.03311258 110% => OK
No of words: 323.0 270.72406181 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68421052632 5.08290768461 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30477006092 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.424148606811 0.540411800872 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 470.7 419.366225166 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 21.2450331126 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.8028248024 49.2860985944 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.3 110.228320801 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.3 21.698381199 149% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06452816374 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.3589403974 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 53.8541721854 88% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.0289183223 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.46 12.2367328918 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.498013245 141% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.