TPO 36: Question: Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they respond to the specific points made in the reading passage.
In the set of materials the reading talk about, possibility of a method of reduce hail, called cloud seeding. And the listening passage argue about, it was not possible to use this method
The reading section explain about, hail that has been a problem for farmers and some areas in United State. several pieces of evidence suggested that cloud seeking ( a method used for reduce the hail) has been effective in protecting crops from hail. First, in laboratory experiment they added silver iodide to cold water vapor in the laboratory, they observed light snow instead of hail. second, according to evidence from Asian, that show cloud seeding has been successfully used to control precipitation in urban areas, and according to local studies, that in an area where cloud seeding was used there was reduced hail damage compared to previous years.
The listening passage argue about reasons show the reading passage not convincing enough that cloud seeding is used full because this experiment be in the laboratory condition but in the real life after cloud seeding might be observed rain or snow instead of light snow. And second, according to evidence in Asia, this method can’t control precipitation and cause to reducing the rainfall. And the last the cities where we have a lot of pollution and maybe is not occur in pollution area.
To sum it all up, by taking all the detailes into consideration , the listening passage don’t support the evidence in reading passage and use of this method maybe cause to some addition problem in some areas.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... was not possible to use this method The reading section explain about, hail ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 109, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Several
...farmers and some areas in United State. several pieces of evidence suggested that cloud...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 164, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of evidence suggested that cloud seeking a method used for reduce the hail has b...
^^
Line 5, column 174, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e suggested that cloud seeking a method used for reduce the hail has been effect...
^^
Line 5, column 389, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Second
...ey observed light snow instead of hail. second, according to evidence from Asian, that...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l damage compared to previous years. The listening passage argue about reason...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 470, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'occurred'.
Suggestion: occurred
...ave a lot of pollution and maybe is not occur in pollution area. To sum ...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...aybe is not occur in pollution area. To sum it all up, by taking all the deta...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 64, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...king all the detailes into consideration , the listening passage don't suppor...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 30.3222958057 135% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.01324503311 279% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1323.0 1373.03311258 96% => OK
No of words: 259.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10810810811 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52425804906 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 145.348785872 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505791505792 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 412.2 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 21.2450331126 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.336205123 49.2860985944 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.0 110.228320801 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.7777777778 21.698381199 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44444444444 7.06452816374 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 4.19205298013 215% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.04743817349 0.272083759551 17% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0225142331693 0.0996497079465 23% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0223109343749 0.0662205650399 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0298943981687 0.162205337803 18% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00959689064905 0.0443174109184 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.3589403974 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 53.8541721854 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.0289183223 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.95 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.498013245 126% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.