TPO 51
According to the presented materials both the article and the lecture discuss traveling to the mars, which is 150 times far from distance between earth and the moon.
The article in the opinion that it is impossible that human can reach to the mars surface; however, the lecture proceeds to present a number of arguments in its rejection.
To being with, it is stated that in the article this travel is very much time consuming, so people who will travel to the mars surface will not have foods supply for this time.
.On the contrary, the lecture asserts that scientist solved this problem. In fact, plans that grow in water shield is a proper for this traveling, In addition, they can clean water, and also they release fresh air.
Second, the author claims that the under zero gravity is harmful for human body. It cause muscles and bones of them get poor. Yet again, the lecture clarifies the point that some of the astronomers was experience this situation, but they could survive with using some strategy. For instance, they exercised every day.
The last point that the writer and the speaker are odds with one another is that the article believes that out of the earth atmosphere, the Sun radiation is very much dangerous, and shield light that can build is huge weight. that cause nobody cannot survive . That being said, the lecture affirms that the time that radiation of the Sun is very much dangerous is very limited, so we can build a small shield at the spaceship.
- 52 3
- TPO 51 3
- Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in thepresent. Do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons andexamples to support your answer. 3
- Working 3 days a week for longer hours is better than working 5 days aweek with shorter hours. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 4, Rule ID: BEING_BEGIN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'begin'?
Suggestion: begin
...mber of arguments in its rejection. To being with, it is stated that in the article ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 178, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...l not have foods supply for this time. .On the contrary, the lecture asserts tha...
^^
Line 4, column 2, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: On
...not have foods supply for this time. .On the contrary, the lecture asserts that ...
^^
Line 4, column 132, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...at grow in water shield is a proper for this traveling, In addition, they can clean ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 85, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'causes'?
Suggestion: causes
...o gravity is harmful for human body. It cause muscles and bones of them get poor. Yet...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 175, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...n, the lecture clarifies the point that some of the astronomers was experience this situati...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 227, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: That
...ld light that can build is huge weight. that cause nobody cannot survive . That bein...
^^^^
Line 6, column 259, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...weight. that cause nobody cannot survive . That being said, the lecture affirms th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, second, so, for instance, in addition, in fact, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1227.0 1373.03311258 89% => OK
No of words: 259.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73745173745 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26105109872 2.5805825403 88% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552123552124 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 366.3 419.366225166 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.6920555843 49.2860985944 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.25 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5833333333 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 7.06452816374 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.09492273731 147% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 53.8541721854 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 12.2367328918 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.