52
According to the presented materials both the article and the lecture discuss colonizing people in asteroids which are rocky and icy giant objects in space is the best option compared to both moon and adjacent planets. The author is of the opinion that low gravity, mining valuable metals, and easy to rich are reasons for that. However, the lecture finds this thesis flawed and proceeds to present a number of arguments in its rejection.
To being with, it is stated that the asteroids is so smaller than moon or planets. The craft need less fuel to carry, because of lower gravity in asteroids. On the contrary, the lecture asserts that the density of the bones and muscles of the people who live on asteroid become lesser. In fact, the less gravity effects on the muscles and bones of these people, and cause them less dense.
Second, the author claims that valuable elements can be found in some of the asteroids. For instance gold and platinum. these materials cost is much higher than the cost to go to the asteroids. Yet again, lecture clarifies the point that cost of transporting metals is considerable, so it’s profit wont very much, and also the price of these materials wont remain as same as now cost. In fact probably the cost of these materials become less after mining a large quantity of them.
The last point on which the lecture odds with each other is that the author believes that the asteroids can be reached easier than moon or planets, because they come near the earth's orbit. these asteroids are reachable by two years tripe. that being said that, the lecturer affirms that getting back from asteroids is much harder than moon or Mars. The asteroid comes near the earth, but then go away. Therefore, comeback to earth is much more difficult.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 3
- 52 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- TPO 35- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Famous entertainers and athletes deserve to have more privacy than they have now. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 88
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 4, Rule ID: BEING_BEGIN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'begin'?
Suggestion: begin
... of arguments in its rejection. To being with, it is stated that the asteroids i...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 66, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... that valuable elements can be found in some of the asteroids. For instance gold and platin...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 121, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
...eroids. For instance gold and platinum. these materials cost is much higher than the ...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 190, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
...ecause they come near the earths orbit. these asteroids are reachable by two years tr...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 240, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: That
...roids are reachable by two years tripe. that being said that, the lecturer affirms t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, second, so, then, therefore, for instance, in fact, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 7.30242825607 205% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1479.0 1373.03311258 108% => OK
No of words: 308.0 270.72406181 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80194805195 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30945052566 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538961038961 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 419.366225166 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.51434878587 330% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.7408367429 49.2860985944 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.0 110.228320801 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1176470588 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.35294117647 7.06452816374 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.3589403974 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 53.8541721854 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 11.0289183223 72% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.26 12.2367328918 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.