TPO 52
The passage states that asteroid colonization would be a possible idea to obtain in the future and provides some reasons to support this claim. On the other hand, the lecturer refutes the writer's reasons and claims that they are not practical.
First, the article discusses that low gravity of asteroids is a great feature of them due to easier landing, take off and carrying more cargo and equipment. The professor challenges this reason by saying that low gravity condition will lead to some health difficulties such as losing muscle mass and bone density even for astronauts. Accordingly, this will be a greater problem for people who want to live in the colony.
Second, the writer asserts that mining precious materials such as gold would be a great opinion to make colonization more profitable. The lecturer argues this possibity and says that cost of mining and transportation of mined materials will be considerable and the net profit will be decreased in this case. Furthermore, the value of these materials is for its scarcity on earth. By supplying huge amount of them, they won't be priceless anymore.
Third, the passage claims that there are a lot of reachable and adjacent asteroids around the earth invariably. However the professor refutes this advantage by saying that these asteroids can be reachable but returning will be a big problem. Since they do not have specific orbit and it is likely they move toward far distances. As a result, coming back from these asteroids will be formidable even more than Mars.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-10 | sonyeoso | 81 | view |
| 2022-10-25 | AT2G38040 | 85 | view |
| 2022-03-01 | parsaramezan | 80 | view |
| 2021-11-24 | lutzuming | 85 | view |
| 2021-08-19 | Percival Wong | 81 | view |
- TPO 45: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives. Use specific reasons and ex 76
- TPO 32 Integrated Writing Task Starting in the 1960s and continuing until the 1980s sailors in Russian submarines patrolling the North Alantic and Arctic Ocean would occasionally hear strange sounds These underwater noises reminded the submarine crews of 87
- Some people think that older children should be required to take care of the younger children. Others think that this should be done by parents or other adults. Which do you prefer? 76
- TPO 37- One of the threats to endangered sea turtle species is the use of nets by commercial shrimp-fishing boats. When turtles get accidentally caught in the nets, they cannot rise to the surface of the ocean to breathe, and they die. Some people suggest 88
- TPO-21 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school. Use specific reasons and examples to support your ans 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 113, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... asteroids around the earth invariably. However the professor refutes this advantage by...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 416, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...will be formidable even more than Mars.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, third, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1283.0 1373.03311258 93% => OK
No of words: 255.0 270.72406181 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03137254902 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67298559293 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 145.348785872 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580392156863 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 396.9 419.366225166 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5166736659 49.2860985944 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.6923076923 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6153846154 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.38461538462 7.06452816374 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.