TPO 53
The professor in the lecture casts doubt on the reading passages arguments, and she says each arguments can be challenging.
First of all, the readings paradoraph suggests that the taxes will discourage people from indulging in unhealthy behaviours. The professor argues that increasing cigarette and unhealthy food taxes is not a practical solution. Because smoker people will buy cheaper and lower quality cigarette which has even harmful subsistance, or people might continue to buy unfelt food even if they are expensive, thus they have lees money to buy hefty food.
Secondly, the reading passage states that taxing people who engage in unhealthy behaviors create extra income that can be used to cover the medical costs, therefore some of the financial burden is shifted from all of society to just those who choose to participate in the unhealthy activities. But the lecturer contends that some people believe taxes of this kind are not financially fair. Because high earning and low earning smoker or unhealthy eaters should pay the same taxes, hence many believe it is not fair for people with smaller incomes.
Finally, the author asserts that the taxes on cigarette and the purposed taxes on unhealthy foods, benefits every one because it’s increases revenue for the government and government use the revenue for other projects that benefit public welfare. While the professor proves that this claim is indefensible by pointing out that the high rate of taxation on cigarette has downside. In order to it has a lot of amount of money the governments will become depend on it, hence they will not implement law to eliminate unhealthy behaviors. For instance government ban smoking out side the building, but they allow people to smoke inside the buildings because they do not want to lose their income.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 166, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...d to cover the medical costs, therefore some of the financial burden is shifted from all of...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 253, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...r projects that benefit public welfare. While the professor proves that this claim is...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 405, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun amount seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of amounts'.
Suggestion: a lot of amounts
...arette has downside. In order to it has a lot of amount of money the governments will become de...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 576, Rule ID: OUT_SIDE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'outside'?
Suggestion: outside
...rs. For instance government ban smoking out side the building, but they allow people to ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, hence, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1531.0 1373.03311258 112% => OK
No of words: 296.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1722972973 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57184698491 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 145.348785872 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577702702703 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 419.366225166 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.7648223594 49.2860985944 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.181818182 110.228320801 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9090909091 21.698381199 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.45454545455 7.06452816374 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.3589403974 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 53.8541721854 84% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.0289183223 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 63.6247240618 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.