TPO 53
The reading and the lecturer are both about the social benefits to impose high taxes on cigarettes and other unhealthy food products. The Author of the reading feels that these taxes can help people to be healthier in the future. The lecturer challenges the claim made by the author. He is of the opinion that these benefits can be challenged in different ways.
To begin with, the author argues that taxes discourage individuals from indulging in unhealthy behaviors. The article mentions that increasing taxes on cigarettes and unhealthy food leads people to buy fewer of them. Also, it can affect on beverages, which help reduce obesity rates. This specific argument is challenged by the lecturer. She claims that high taxes induce smokers to buy cheaper and low-quality cigarettes, which can influence their health. Additionally, she says their costs for remedy will increase, and this event can happen about the unhealthy food, too.
Secondly, the writer suggests that taxes of this sort are financially fair. In the article, it is stated that when people get sick by smoking or eating unhealthy food, they make specific and enormous medical costs. Taxing people who engage in unhealthy behaviors can use for low-income people. The lecturer, however, rebuts on this by mentioning that it is unfair because it accounts for lower-income people who use unhealthy behaviors. The lecturer elaborates on this by bringing up the point that smaller income people cannot pay the taxes, consequently, it is unfair.
Finally, the reading posits that taxation on cigarettes can enhance revenue for the government. In the article, it is stated that the government can spend a lot of money on public warfare, such as building stadiums or creating public parks. In contrast, the lecturer's position is that it depends on the revenue that the government obtains. Moreover, she says, for example, the government permits smokers to use cigarettes in every single situation, and it just thinks about its incomes from this especial way.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives. Use specific reasons and examples t 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statements? Because people are busy doing so many different things, they do very few things well. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- TPO 48 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays. 73
- TPO 45 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 231, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...p people to be healthier in the future. The lecturer challenges the claim made by t...
^^^
Line 3, column 231, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...ople to buy fewer of them. Also, it can affect on beverages, which help reduce obesity ra...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, for example, in contrast, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 12.0772626932 149% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 22.412803532 170% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1700.0 1373.03311258 124% => OK
No of words: 327.0 270.72406181 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19877675841 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65579384282 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 145.348785872 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525993883792 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 419.366225166 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 3.25607064018 307% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.0945624963 49.2860985944 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.4736842105 110.228320801 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2105263158 21.698381199 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.68421052632 7.06452816374 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 63.6247240618 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.