TPO-54
In the reading 3 solusions for reservation of Salton Sea was recommended. In the lecture, the speaker refutes all the solusions provided in the reading and called them unrealistic and non-practical.
First, the lecturer agrees that the desalination facilities might reduce the amount of saline in the lake. However, the remnant of desalination process would left behind in the soil and would cause serious health issues for people. the remnant includes salt and other materials like selenium which could be move by wind. If people breath them it would cause serious health issues. Therefore, the desalination facilities do not work.
Also, diluting the salt level by ocean' water which was proposed by text might reduce the salt but it needs a lot of pumpline which might not be funded by government. Installation of pumpline from ocean to lake might need 100 or more kilometers pump installation which is very expensive and government might not pay for such massive and expensive construction. So, this solusion is non-practical.
Lastly, as the reading claims providing devision by constructing wall and making several salinity level section might work for short-term but can not provide long-term solusion. Geological activities like earthquack happens in that area and walls might collapse and water would mix with other part as a result. Therefore, building the wall can not remove the issue or solve problem for long-run.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-24 | YasamanEsml | 90 | view |
| 2023-07-24 | YasamanEsml | 85 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | Take | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | Take | 90 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | Take | 76 | view |
- TPO 53 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation 70
- TPO 53 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation 65
- Official 40 Task 1 Many scientists believe it would be possible to maintain a permanent human presence on Mars or the Moon On the other hand conditions on Venus are so extreme and inhospitable that maintaining a human presence there would be impossible 73
- TPO 48 85
- TPO 54 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 158, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'leave'
Suggestion: leave
...e remnant of desalination process would left behind in the soil and would cause seri...
^^^^
Line 2, column 232, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...cause serious health issues for people. the remnant includes salt and other materia...
^^^
Line 2, column 321, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e selenium which could be move by wind. If people breath them it would cause serio...
^^
Line 4, column 82, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[8]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun salinity seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'some salinity'.
Suggestion: some salinity
...evision by constructing wall and making several salinity level section might work for short-term...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, lastly, so, therefore, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 5.04856512141 297% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 22.412803532 31% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1202.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 228.0 270.72406181 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27192982456 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83016769545 2.5805825403 110% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 145.348785872 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592105263158 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 360.0 419.366225166 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.639052152 49.2860985944 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.4615384615 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5384615385 21.698381199 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06452816374 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183863688474 0.272083759551 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0619312639934 0.0996497079465 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0510084160508 0.0662205650399 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0995505213518 0.162205337803 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0690273675423 0.0443174109184 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.