Both the passage and lecture talk about the topic of reducing the salinity of the lake. In writing to solve the problem, three solutions, including evaporating water, adding ocean water, and building walls in the water have been elaborated. The professor, however, claims that these methods are unrealistic and unpractical.
As opposed to the writer's idea that the salt in the water can be directly removed by desalination facilities, the professor states that using this kind of device will lead to some health problems, she advances the theory by saying that When the facilities are used, not only will salt be left, but also other solid materials or chemicals are removed, including toxic ones, such as selenium, which is blew into the air by wind and breathed by people.
The professor continues to discredit the writer's assertion that salinity will be diluted with Pacific ocean water via pipeline, by examining the fact that it's difficult to construct pipelines. In detail, she points out that the local government who don't have sufficient resources to do this. And the nearest shoreline of the ocean from the lake is at least 1000km away, which is extremely expensive to build the pipeline over such a long distance.
It is the professor's third argument that building walls will be destroyed, which contradicts the view of the writer that salinity can be reduced with the construction of walls, separating the lake into big and small parts. She contends that this way is unlikely because this region has frequent geographic activists, such as earthquakes, which will destroy the wall. Once the walls are collapsed, the water used to be separated by salinity will mix back to its original state again, the movement is labor without results.
An apparent divide exists between the writer and the professor on the way to solving the salty lake problems.
- TPO56 76
- Glass is a favored building material for modern architecture yet it is also very dangerous for wild birds Because they often cannot distinguish between glass and open air millions of birds are harmed every year when they try to fly through glass windows T 73
- Your university will spend money on dormitory to improve the life quality of students Which of the following do you think is the best way 1 Providing a room for quiet study 2 Building an exercise room 3 Providing an entertainment place watch films 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement Kids should play more and study more instead of spending time on household chores 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The knowledge we gain from our personal experiences is more valuable than the knowledge we gain from books Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer Do not use memorized examples 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 19, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...tic and unpractical. As opposed to the writers idea that the salt in the water can be ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 401, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'blowed', 'blown'.
Suggestion: blowed; blown
... toxic ones, such as selenium, which is blew into the air by wind and breathed by pe...
^^^^
Line 3, column 42, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...he professor continues to discredit the writers assertion that salinity will be diluted...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 249, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...oints out that the local government who dont have sufficient resources to do this. A...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, third, at least, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1554.0 1373.03311258 113% => OK
No of words: 308.0 270.72406181 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04545454545 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60237349012 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 145.348785872 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590909090909 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 419.366225166 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 21.2450331126 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 98.1810606031 49.2860985944 199% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.272727273 110.228320801 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 21.698381199 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.54545454545 7.06452816374 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.357831024955 0.272083759551 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121302484105 0.0996497079465 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0727506189086 0.0662205650399 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19223888905 0.162205337803 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0405558417032 0.0443174109184 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.3589403974 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 53.8541721854 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.0289183223 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.42419426049 114% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 63.6247240618 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.498013245 126% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.