TPO 57 integrated
The main idea of both passage and the lecture is about whether the government should invest on railway or not. with this in mind, the author mentions that there is some critics about this decision and provides three of them as to support its attitude toward the problem. The lecture, on the contrary, categorically refutes all evidences and explains that this investment is essential and beneficial for all the people and supports its standpoint by elaborating more details for each reason.
First, both reading and listening discuss the idea of whether spending money is a wast or not. In this vein, the passage puts forth the idea of total amount of huge bulk of government money required for maintaining the service in contrast with the income from passengers which is low. This process can be offered to private services to reduce costs. The lecture, on the other hand, states that its silly idea and the critic people fail to understand that the purpose of this railway is not to get profit but to provide the need at the trains service. Transporting for people who live in remote area is expensive and this way can be helpful for them to save money as they have the same rights with people who live inside of the city.
Second, both text and talk put forth the idea of unfarity of this situation for private transportation companies like airline. In this line of thought, the passage maintains that he intercity rails ticket is cheaper so people will prefer to use them instead of flying. However the lecture points out that the government supports all of the transportation vessels like the money it invest for airtrafic control towers and officers or the weather satellite for having a safe fly. Priveate companies can provide all these costs by it selves.
Third, both reading and the listening materials talk about how much the railways are not important in the US and this investment is a lose of money. In this regard, the passage explains that less than 1 percent of people in the united states use railways to transport in the city and they mainly use cars. The government should pay this money for improvement of highways. Concersely, the speaker states that it is less in use because it is out of date and government should even invest more on it to become update so people will use the service just as Japanies people do everyday. This city have financially supported so much on this vessel that today people use railways as a public transportation instead of cars.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-18 | Fateme_mhd | 3 | view |
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 112, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: With
...rnment should invest on railway or not. with this in mind, the author mentions that ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 156, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are some critics'?
Suggestion: there are some critics
... this in mind, the author mentions that there is some critics about this decision and provides three ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 269, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...l prefer to use them instead of flying. However the lecture points out that the governm...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 329, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...points out that the government supports all of the transportation vessels like the money i...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 381, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'invests'?
Suggestion: invests
...ransportation vessels like the money it invest for airtrafic control towers and office...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 133, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ortant in the US and this investment is a lose of money. In this regard, the passage e...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 572, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
... the service just as Japanies people do everyday. This city have financially supported s...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, second, so, third, as to, in contrast, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 7.30242825607 246% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 22.412803532 174% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 30.3222958057 188% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2055.0 1373.03311258 150% => OK
No of words: 431.0 270.72406181 159% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76798143852 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55637350225 4.04702891845 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52041796447 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 145.348785872 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.473317865429 0.540411800872 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 638.1 419.366225166 152% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.2397850399 49.2860985944 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.882352941 110.228320801 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3529411765 21.698381199 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.52941176471 7.06452816374 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0946880472894 0.272083759551 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0349298200166 0.0996497079465 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0195738694853 0.0662205650399 30% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0641586186122 0.162205337803 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0152028472102 0.0443174109184 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.2367328918 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 63.6247240618 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 112, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: With
...rnment should invest on railway or not. with this in mind, the author mentions that ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 156, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are some critics'?
Suggestion: there are some critics
... this in mind, the author mentions that there is some critics about this decision and provides three ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 269, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...l prefer to use them instead of flying. However the lecture points out that the governm...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 329, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...points out that the government supports all of the transportation vessels like the money i...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 381, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'invests'?
Suggestion: invests
...ransportation vessels like the money it invest for airtrafic control towers and office...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 133, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ortant in the US and this investment is a lose of money. In this regard, the passage e...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 572, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
... the service just as Japanies people do everyday. This city have financially supported s...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, second, so, third, as to, in contrast, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 7.30242825607 246% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 22.412803532 174% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 30.3222958057 188% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2055.0 1373.03311258 150% => OK
No of words: 431.0 270.72406181 159% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76798143852 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55637350225 4.04702891845 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52041796447 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 145.348785872 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.473317865429 0.540411800872 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 638.1 419.366225166 152% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.2397850399 49.2860985944 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.882352941 110.228320801 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3529411765 21.698381199 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.52941176471 7.06452816374 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0946880472894 0.272083759551 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0349298200166 0.0996497079465 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0195738694853 0.0662205650399 30% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0641586186122 0.162205337803 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0152028472102 0.0443174109184 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.2367328918 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 63.6247240618 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.