tpo integraded 33 -2
Both the reading and the lecture talk about a stone ball found in Scotland. The reading states that there are three theories to suggest the purpose and the meaning of the stone ball. However, the lecture disagrees. It claims that the three theories mentioned in the reading are not convincing.
First, the reading states that. The stone may be used as a weapon for hunting and fighting. However, the lecture disagrees. It claims that the stones were not used as a weapon. The curved stones were well preserved. Moreover the curved stones have no sign of tears or cracks. That means that the curved stones were not used as a weapon in the Neolithic period.
Second, the reading stated that the stones were used as a system for weight or measurement. But, the lecture disagrees. It claims that the curved stones were made from different materials like sand stone, green stone, so some stones balls have different density. It means that the stones had different weight and not using as measuring tolls.
Third, the reading states that stones ball have a social purpose, because the stone balls have complex design on them. However, the lecture disagrees. It claims that some stones ball had intricate design and some of them had simple design. Moreover, during the Neolithic period people were buried with their possession with them in their craved, but any of the stones balls found in the crave, which mean that the stones balls had any social purpose.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-15 | Salu | 70 | view |
| 2020-06-08 | maya14 | 3 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | lucasantunes | 80 | view |
| 2019-10-24 | fateme ozggoli | 85 | view |
| 2019-03-05 | ilda | 85 | view |
- TPO-43 - Independent Writing Task Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away-Wa 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments should spend more money in sponsoring arts than in athletics (like state Olympics team). 73
- Some students learn better by reading. Others learn more from listening to a teacher. Which way of learning is better for you, and why? Include details and examples to support your explanation. 73
- Is it more important to work hard many hours and support your family well, or spend more hours with your family and build good relationships? 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In order to become financially responsible adults children should learn to manage their own money at young age Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 217, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
... The curved stones were well preserved. Moreover the curved stones have no sign of tears...
^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 384, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...d, but any of the stones balls found in the crave, which mean that the stones balls had a...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 452, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he stones balls had any social purpose.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, third, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 30.3222958057 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1217.0 1373.03311258 89% => OK
No of words: 248.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90725806452 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.21146839946 2.5805825403 86% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 145.348785872 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.431451612903 0.540411800872 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 358.2 419.366225166 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 21.2450331126 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.0214476436 49.2860985944 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 64.0526315789 110.228320801 58% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.0526315789 21.698381199 60% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.31578947368 7.06452816374 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.434935884165 0.272083759551 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15319102794 0.0996497079465 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113364276696 0.0662205650399 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.299556727071 0.162205337803 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0572469740268 0.0443174109184 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.2 13.3589403974 61% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.2 53.8541721854 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 11.0289183223 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.31 12.2367328918 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.83 8.42419426049 81% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 63.6247240618 63% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 4.0 10.7273730684 37% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.498013245 69% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.2008830022 62% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.