TPO01
The reading text and lecture are both deal with the new proposal of 4 day work week in the company. The author of this article feels that this new opinion of the worker will beneficial for both employer and employ. The lacturer dispute the claims made by the author. His position is just opposite of the view of writer.
According to the reading text, this shorter work will make company more profitable and reduced the number of the error done by the employ. Article mention that, by this way worker feels more alertness and restfull life. The view is challenged by the lecturer, He claim that, because of this new proposal company would spent more money on recruitement and training . Additionally, He argues that, employer require more spaces and computer to accomodate that new employ.
Secondly, The author suggests that It will reduced the unemployment rate in the country. In the article, it is stated that company owner required more worker to copue up the market demand. However, Speaker asserst that, he goes on to say that this new systerm will reduced the job availability in the market. Further he explain that, Ownwe will expect more work in shorter time from the employ. It will make the worklife unpleasant.
Finally, The author mention that, It will improve the quality of life of the worker. He says that, Because of this new work schedule Worker can spent more time with his family and friends. The lecturer
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-07-01 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 70 | view |
2020-01-06 | Md Lutfor Rahman | 73 | view |
- Summarize the points made in the lecture you just heard explaining how they cast doubt on the points made in the reading Tidal Power 66
- pruning 61
- Ingrate the author s view and lecturer s opinion 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement A university education should be provided free of charge to all interested scholars Use examples and reasons to support your position 60
- Pruning technique in plant raising 73
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 21 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 16 12
No. of Words: 245 250
No. of Characters: 1149 1200
No. of Different Words: 119 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.956 4.2
Average Word Length: 4.69 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.265 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 85 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 61 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 28 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 11 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 15.312 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.059 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.188 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.337 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.337 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.121 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 4