tpo11
Both the reading and lecture are about the reduction of reading particular in literature-novels field. The reading provides some reasons that this decline will create some negative impression on the society. The lecture casts doubt on the claims made in the article. The professor finds all arguments unconvincing.
First of all, the author of reading declares that literature plays a crucial role in people's life. Literature can reinforce the imagination or empathize feeling among readers; furthermore, it is able to improve of our perceiving of language. This point is challenged by the lecturer. The professor points out other books such as history, science, politic and you name it, are being supported by people and they can also tender such a great benefit. As a matter a fact they help people to boost their brain's performance; consequently, the progress of understanding is not just restricted to literature novels.
Secondly, the article contends that nowadays people would rather watch television shows, listening music and so on; subsequently, this horrible circumstance can affect on the level of culture. This argument is rebutted by the professor. She believes that the culture has been changed and human beings can gain information about culture in plenty of other resource like an awesome music or a great movie. She elaborates on this by mentioning that these types of entertainments speak more directly than literature novels do.
Finally, the passage reading claims that since there is not enough reader, so publishers do not rely on talent young writers and this will caused literature stories to decline more and more. In the contrast the professor refutes this reason. She expresses that writers themselves are the main culprit of this calamity, because they employ the hard sentences which are difficult to be understood by people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-20 | Haleh Rezazadeh | view | |
| 2023-05-20 | Haleh Rezazadeh | view | |
| 2022-01-10 | ShayesteTR | 70 | view |
| 2021-12-18 | shabnam_520 | 80 | view |
| 2021-04-04 | niloolin | 70 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader. 67
- Do you agree or disagree? The food we eat today is much healthier than past. 90
- People attend college or university for many different reasons (forexample, new experiences, career preparation, increased knowledge).Why do you think people attend college or university? Use specificreasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Tpo12 76
- a foreign visitor has only one day to spend in your country. Where should this visitor go on that day? 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 268, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...oubt on the claims made in the article. The professor finds all arguments unconvinc...
^^^
Line 3, column 162, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...quently, this horrible circumstance can affect on the level of culture. This argument is ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 140, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'cause'
Suggestion: cause
...y on talent young writers and this will caused literature stories to decline more and ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1566.0 1373.03311258 114% => OK
No of words: 295.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30847457627 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86749607753 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 145.348785872 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616949152542 0.540411800872 114% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 419.366225166 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.9566081216 49.2860985944 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.875 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4375 21.698381199 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3125 7.06452816374 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.343539817337 0.272083759551 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0978989811715 0.0996497079465 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0755444950764 0.0662205650399 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198517038228 0.162205337803 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0333306632511 0.0443174109184 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.3589403974 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.8541721854 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 63.6247240618 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.