The article and lecture both explains the alternative energy from which can be drawn from the tides. The author of the reading says that this potential energy can be exploited by building barrage or dams across a river or at the mouth of the bay. However, the professor in the lecture casts doubts claiming that in the process of drawing energy from tides there are quite a few drawbacks associated with it.
First of all, the author points out that this is the same technology that is used in hydroelectric power plants where the gates and turbines are built are regular intervals along the dam which are opened when there is a level in rise of tide. This point is challenged by the lecture, as the professor induces the drawbacks of it. She says though this is an alternate energy source, only a fraction of the total energy can be procured. But still she claims that this fraction of energy drawn can be continued at the regional level
Secondly, the author contends that this tidal power is renewable, non-polluting and does no contribution to the greenhouse gas effect. The lecture on the other hand posits some of the environmental impacts associated with it. She rebuts that aquatic life in seas and estuaries can be possibly affected as the quality of water changes when assorted. She elaborates this by mentioning that fishes that migrate between sea water and river water would be hampered consequently do to the deposits of mud and sediments it would be a devastating conditions for the birds and the associated vegetation for their inhabitation.
Finally the author of the passage concludes that this technology to exploit the potential energy can provide a useful energy supplement whereas the professor argues that this alternative source can only impact a paucity area and also puts forth the idea that the installation cost would be much expensive for such small fraction of energy drawn
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study. 33
- Although innovations such as video, computers, and the Internet seem to offer schools improved methods for instructing students, these technologies all too often distract from real learning. - GRE Issue 119 33
- TPO14 - INTEGRATED ESSAY 3
- Parents make the best teachers. Do you agree with that statement? Use specific examples and reasons to explain your answer 92
- Tidal power 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 173, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...t. The lecture on the other hand posits some of the environmental impacts associated with i...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 460, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... water and river water would be hampered consequently do to the deposits of mud a...
^^
Line 5, column 526, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eposits of mud and sediments it would be a devastating conditions for the birds a...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...d vegetation for their inhabitation. Finally the author of the passage concludes tha...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 97, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...chnology to exploit the potential energy can provide a useful energy supplement w...
^^
Line 7, column 171, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lement whereas the professor argues that this alternative source can only impact ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, whereas, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.4613686534 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1592.0 1373.03311258 116% => OK
No of words: 323.0 270.72406181 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92879256966 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64678180072 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 145.348785872 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517027863777 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 419.366225166 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 21.2450331126 137% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 82.9450679518 49.2860985944 168% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.727272727 110.228320801 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.3636363636 21.698381199 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1818181818 7.06452816374 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0934100400876 0.272083759551 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0395314768866 0.0996497079465 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0220197775586 0.0662205650399 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0643926382169 0.162205337803 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.012178335672 0.0443174109184 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.3589403974 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 53.8541721854 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.0289183223 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.91 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 63.6247240618 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.498013245 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.