Some people believe that our ever-increasing use of technology significantly reduces our opportunities for human interaction but the advantages of this technology outweighs its limitation. Technology has plethora of proponents like the computer, the Internet, which is a technical buzz word used now days in the field of communication.
Social networking which paves a major platform for communication like Facebook, twitter, Skype is where people can share their view, connect remotely across the world and stay in touch anytime and anywhere. To support my claim, I would start with an example. I once read an article about a long-lost family who were once joint together, were again reunited with the help of the communication technologies (i.e.) Facebook.
Technology also lead to a revolution of online forums where people can post relative problems and find appropriate solutions. Hence here, a crowd interaction is possible. This is also one way where people can communicate to a profound group of unknown people.
Besides conventional way of communication is also accepted at some rare cases. Surfeit use of technology reduces our interaction with our adjacent mate. It has let to the failure of peer-to-peer interaction. Having communication and interaction with these modern machines has let people become introverts such that they don’t have the gut to talk or behave when met in person
Though technological revolution has its own issues, it is unduly when compared to its remarkable journey till date. When this technology is used correctly it is a boon to mankind else is a bane
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study. 33
- Parents make the best teachers. Do you agree with that statement? Use specific examples and reasons to explain your answer 92
- Although innovations such as video, computers, and the Internet seem to offer schools improved methods for instructing students, these technologies all too often distract from real learning. - GRE Issue 119 33
- TO ACHIEVE SUCCESS ONE MUST REJECT CONVENTIONAL THINKING 50
- Some people believe that our ever-increasing use of technology significantly reduces our opportunities for human interaction. Other people believe that technology provides us with new and better ways to communicate and connect with one another. 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 126, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...roblems and find appropriate solutions. Hence here, a crowd interaction is possible. ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 262, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cation and interaction with these modern machines has let people become introvert...
^^
Line 5, column 117, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ed to its remarkable journey till date. When this technology is used correctly it is...
^^^^
Line 5, column 194, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y it is a boon to mankind else is a bane
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.6327345309 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.9520958084 31% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 11.1786427146 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 13.6137724551 81% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 28.8173652695 76% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 55.5748502994 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 13.0 16.3942115768 79% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1350.0 2260.96107784 60% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 253.0 441.139720559 57% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33596837945 5.12650576532 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.56307096286 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14845891087 2.78398813304 113% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 204.123752495 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.620553359684 0.468620217663 132% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 705.55239521 62% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.96107784431 101% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.471057884232 212% => OK
Article: 2.0 8.76447105788 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 19.7664670659 66% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 22.8473053892 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 70.6721742486 57.8364921388 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.846153846 119.503703932 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4615384615 23.324526521 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.53846153846 5.70786347227 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.25449101796 76% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 6.88822355289 29% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.67664670659 86% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.412671403705 0.218282227539 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12637116401 0.0743258471296 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.13122175985 0.0701772020484 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199534022778 0.128457276422 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116158353191 0.0628817314937 185% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 14.3799401198 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.3550499002 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.1628742515 156% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.197005988 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.5979740519 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.32208582834 105% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 98.500998004 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 12.3882235529 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.1389221557 86% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.9071856287 118% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.