TPO15
In this set of material, the reading passage claims that the cane toad - a species of amphibian native to central and south America- introduced to Australia to protect from farmers' products, but then it was a harmful effect on other small native animals. The lecture brings three approaches for terminating to this problem; however the lecture finds all ideas suspicious and provides some evidence to advocate that these approaches are unsuccessful. The information the professor provides contradicts the fact outlined in the reading passage.
First, the reading passage declares that building a national fence can help to control cane toad population, because they will not be able to spread any more, in contrast the lecture argues that there are a lot of cane toad's eggs in the rivers that they can carry other parts of country, consequently they can produce in other side easily, so this national fence is ineffective.
Second, the author of reading proposes that Australia should use volunteers to capture these cane toads, volunteers can get them with hand or can destroy their eggs, on the contrary the professor believes that this idea can hart to native frog of Australia. Sine these native frogs are similar to the cane toads especially when they are young, subsequently untrained volunteers will not discern them with the cane toad species.
Third, the reading passages tells about a disease-causing virus that this type of virus can infect some reptiles and other amphibian species, however it will not create harm effects on them, it just have harm influence on cane toad, conversely the lecturer argues that Australia's reptiles or amphibians frequently transport to other countries for research and so on, when these infect reptiles or amphibians come to America, The virus into them can destroy the cane toad that is a native species in America.
- Tpo33 80
- Do you prefer? Eating in restaurant or cooking at home? 90
- TPO27-TPO 27 integrated writing Little ice age 66
- tpo7 3
- Task2 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement A boss or manager should not form close friendship with his her employees Use details and example to support your answer 52
Comments
Essay evaluation report
the cane toad - a species of amphibian native to central and south America- introduced to Australia to protect from farmers' products
the cane toad ... was introduced to Australia to protect from farmers' products
it just have harm influence
it just has harm influence
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 2 2
No. of Words: 303 250
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
---------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 24 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 2 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 8 12
No. of Words: 303 250
No. of Characters: 1529 1200
No. of Different Words: 152 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.172 4.2
Average Word Length: 5.046 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.574 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 110 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 90 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 54 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 33 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 37.875 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 24.962 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.625 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.419 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.419 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.193 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'consequently', 'conversely', 'first', 'however', 'second', 'so', 'then', 'third', 'in contrast', 'on the contrary']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.282674772036 0.261695866417 108% => OK
Verbs: 0.133738601824 0.158904122519 84% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0851063829787 0.0723426182421 118% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0425531914894 0.0435111971325 98% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0364741641337 0.0277247811725 132% => OK
Prepositions: 0.106382978723 0.128828473217 83% => OK
Participles: 0.0121580547112 0.0370669169778 33% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.63840397855 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0364741641337 0.0208969081088 175% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.118541033435 0.128158765124 92% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0364741641337 0.0158828679856 230% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0121580547112 0.0114777025283 106% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1862.0 1645.83664459 113% => OK
No of words: 304.0 271.125827815 112% => OK
Chars per words: 6.125 6.08160592843 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.04852973271 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.371710526316 0.374372842146 99% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.302631578947 0.287516216867 105% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.207236842105 0.187439937562 111% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.115131578947 0.113142543107 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63840397855 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529605263158 0.539623497131 98% => OK
Word variations: 54.2293261159 53.8517498576 101% => OK
How many sentences: 7.0 13.0529801325 54% => OK
Sentence length: 43.4285714286 21.7502111507 200% => Sentence lengths are too long.
Sentence length SD: 129.104292598 49.3711431718 261% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 266.0 132.220823453 201% => Less chars per sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 43.4285714286 21.7502111507 200% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 1.57142857143 0.878197800319 179% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.39072847682 0% => OK
Readability: 73.6917293233 50.5018328374 146% => OK
Elegance: 1.88571428571 1.90840788429 99% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.713821172869 0.549887131256 130% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.186477463079 0.142949733639 130% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0514556190729 0.0787303798458 65% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.771770641623 0.631733273073 122% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.165315885781 0.139662658121 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.410266852801 0.266732575781 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0818283126884 0.103435571967 79% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.339864319012 0.414875509568 82% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.00933895145175 0.0530846634433 18% => Paragraphs are so close to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.503745547014 0.40443939384 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0477953595049 0.0528353158467 90% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.26048565121 23% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 2.0 3.49668874172 57% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.62251655629 110% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 3.1766004415 31% => OK
Total topic words: 7.0 10.2958057395 68% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.