TPO17- decreasing the birds population
The lecturer and the passage discuss the decreasing of the birds population. Although the passage claims that the birds population has been decreasing through the growth of human population and increase in use of pesticides, the speaker refutes this this idea through a number of reasons which will be described in this report.
First and foremost, the passage points out that by growing human populations, the natural habitat of birds will be gradually decreased. The speaker, in contrast, rejects this by claiming that although the urban growth has negative effect on environment, it provides better and larger habitat for other species. For instance, the habitat of seagull and pegeons has been enlarged and they can see everywhere. The speaker states that the home of some birds may shrinks, however the others may grow.
Furthermore, unlike the passage which states that in order to population growth of human, exploiting of lands has been increased due to provide more supplies, the speaker argues that nowadays in the USA less land used for agriculture than before. They substitude the introduction of the new crops which are more nutrients instead of using more lands to cultivate more crops.
Finally, although the passage says that the use of chemical fertilizer and pesticides are harmful for birds and their food chain, the professor disagress by mentioning that in these days people are more clever than before and two major changes have been happened which decrease the threatening of birds habitat. Firstly, the new pesticides are much less harmful for the environment and secondly, a new production has been introduced which is less dangerous for birds and more pest resist for crops. With two thes features the pesticides are no longer harmful for the birds habitat.
Through these reason which have been described above, the passage's claims are rejected by the lecturer.
- TPO44-Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Other believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are relate 73
- TPO 17-task1 3
- TPO 22- Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom 73
- Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays not mine 68
- TPO 42-glass danger for birds 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 61, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'birds'' or 'bird's'?
Suggestion: birds'; bird's
...e passage discuss the decreasing of the birds population. Although the passage claims...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 116, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'birds'' or 'bird's'?
Suggestion: birds'; bird's
...n. Although the passage claims that the birds population has been decreasing through ...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 247, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: this
... use of pesticides, the speaker refutes this this idea through a number of reasons which ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 568, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'birds'' or 'bird's'?
Suggestion: birds'; bird's
...esticides are no longer harmful for the birds habitat. Through these reason which ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, may, second, secondly, so, for instance, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1598.0 1373.03311258 116% => OK
No of words: 305.0 270.72406181 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2393442623 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58690394558 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501639344262 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 478.8 419.366225166 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.4406456328 49.2860985944 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.166666667 110.228320801 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4166666667 21.698381199 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.06452816374 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333749548633 0.272083759551 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128271264675 0.0996497079465 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0652756121847 0.0662205650399 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167182798465 0.162205337803 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0844360913324 0.0443174109184 191% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.3589403974 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.8541721854 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 63.6247240618 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.