tpo18
Both author and lecturer offer two opposing views on methods and their efficiencies for solving the extinction risks of Torreya taxifoha. While the reading passage lists some solution for this danger, the professor counters these specific points and presents some clues to call into question for the information in the text.
First of all, the professor refutes that the reestablishing of trees in the same spot, where is their habitat for a long duration, will be effective. However, in the article, it is named as one of the suitable solutions which can address this problem. Lecturer states that the microclimate of in this specific area is been affected a lot from the global weather alteration. As there is a global warming, the temperature has been increased, and wetlands are drained. Consequently, this location is not as cold as the previous time.
Next, the passage presumes that the new habitat in the further north of Florida with cooler climate is a decent option to deal with this problem. On the contrary, the professor asserts that this execution can be considered as new threaten for the other dominant species. He points to the Black Locus Tree as an example of this issue. As he illustrates, the adaptation of this tree in its new habitat leads to the quick and expand separation of it. In this condition, other trees which thrive there for a long span were in danger of extinction; because the new tree exploits their nutrients. Thus, the new habitat for taxifoha can cause a crisis for the other trees and plants.
Finally, meanwhile, the article uses the surmise of preserving the research center as a possible accountable choice, the professor casts doubt on the efficiency of this option. Based on the professor evidence, a type of tree which has the vary ranges with dense population is more resistance in the actual life. On the other hand, the preserve center has this limitation which cannot cover all variation and population of a specific tree. As a result, even it preserves in the center, it does have no opportunity in the real habitat for surviving.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-12 | khatuntajkera | 80 | view |
| 2020-07-26 | Nasirti | 70 | view |
| 2020-03-01 | bahar_93 | 70 | view |
| 2020-02-12 | sarkar | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | supergirl20 | 70 | view |
- Claim: When planning courses, educators should take into account the interests and suggestions of their students.Reason: Students are more motivated to learn when they are interested in what they are studying.Write a response in which you discuss the exte 66
- tpo34 86
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom. 70
- Young people should be encouraged to pursue long-term, realistic goals rather than seek immediate fame and recognition. 16
- tpo24 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 236, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ssor evidence, a type of tree which has the vary ranges with dense population is more re...
^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['consequently', 'finally', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'thus', 'while', 'as a result', 'first of all', 'on the contrary', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.264631043257 0.261695866417 101% => OK
Verbs: 0.12213740458 0.158904122519 77% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0839694656489 0.0723426182421 116% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0254452926209 0.0435111971325 58% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0254452926209 0.0277247811725 92% => OK
Prepositions: 0.147582697201 0.128828473217 115% => OK
Participles: 0.030534351145 0.0370669169778 82% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.68935674409 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0101781170483 0.0208969081088 49% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.167938931298 0.128158765124 131% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0127226463104 0.0158828679856 80% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0127226463104 0.0114777025283 111% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2095.0 1645.83664459 127% => OK
No of words: 353.0 271.125827815 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.93484419263 6.08160592843 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.04852973271 107% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.334277620397 0.374372842146 89% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.28045325779 0.287516216867 98% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.201133144476 0.187439937562 107% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.113314447592 0.113142543107 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68935674409 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 145.348785872 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532577903683 0.539623497131 99% => OK
Word variations: 57.5088046951 53.8517498576 107% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0529801325 130% => OK
Sentence length: 20.7647058824 21.7502111507 95% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.4455090576 49.3711431718 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.235294118 132.220823453 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7647058824 21.7502111507 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.705882352941 0.878197800319 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.39072847682 29% => OK
Readability: 48.8100316614 50.5018328374 97% => OK
Elegance: 2.55882352941 1.90840788429 134% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.624025589575 0.549887131256 113% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.13788166464 0.142949733639 96% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0609578215075 0.0787303798458 77% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.613901362755 0.631733273073 97% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.0880331279716 0.139662658121 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.281453604135 0.266732575781 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0747288326405 0.103435571967 72% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.485561645809 0.414875509568 117% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.107789684818 0.0530846634433 203% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.45035998174 0.40443939384 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0500907098496 0.0528353158467 95% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.26048565121 94% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.49668874172 86% => OK
Negative topic words: 6.0 3.62251655629 166% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.1766004415 94% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 10.2958057395 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Less content wanted. Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.