In this set of materials, the reading passage states that the zebra mussel has been spreading out from its original habitats and there is no way to stop this invasion. However, the lecturer finds all idea skeptical and refute them all because he believes that it is not a serious threat.
First of all, the author of the passage claims that ships are carrying zebra mussel from the original habitats and passing them in waterways. In contrast, the lecturer argues that people did not have enough knowledge in the past because they released the water,full of zebra mussels, in some new habitats. So, if they be required to empty this water in the ocean and fulfill the ships with fresh ocean water, the salt of ocean will kill zebra mussels and they cannot colonize.
Furthermore, it is mentioned in the reading passage that zebra mussels can dominate a new habitats right after reaching it. On the contrary, the lecturer contends that this statement is correct just at the new beginning. He explains that some new predators like birds can switch from what they were eating before to eating zebra mussels. Hence, the population would become balance.
Finally, the reading passage asserts that there is decline in the overall fish population because of the food compete. Conversely, the lecturer claims that the negative effect of zebra mussel is just on those species which eat planktons. In fact, zebra mussel has advantages for bottom fishes which eat zebra mussel. Their population would be increased after the growth of zebra mussels.
- Should your government place a tax on the junk food and fatty snacks? 70
- TPO 31 Integrated Writing Task 80
- •Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The more money people have, the more they should contribute to charity. 80
- •Do you agree or disagree? It is better to relax by watching a movie or reading a book than doing physical exercise. Explain your answer with examples and specific reasons. 85
- •In order to attract more tourists, the government could either improve safety by hiring more police or improve its appearance by repairing old buildings and streets. Which way do you think is more effective? 78
Essay evaluation report
the lecturer finds all idea skeptical and refute them all
the lecturer finds all idea skeptical and refutes them all
if they be required to empty
if they are required to empty
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 25 in 30
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 2 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 13 12
No. of Words: 259 250
No. of Characters: 1250 1200
No. of Different Words: 136 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.012 4.2
Average Word Length: 4.826 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.234 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 91 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 67 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 40 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 17 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.923 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.173 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.769 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.37 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.37 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.129 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 4
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 261, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , full
...the past because they released the water,full of zebra mussels, in some new habitats....
^^^^^
Line 3, column 92, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'habitat'?
Suggestion: habitat
...e that zebra mussels can dominate a new habitats right after reaching it. On the contrar...
^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['conversely', 'finally', 'first', 'furthermore', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'in contrast', 'in fact', 'first of all', 'on the contrary']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.257839721254 0.261695866417 99% => OK
Verbs: 0.156794425087 0.158904122519 99% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0662020905923 0.0723426182421 92% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0418118466899 0.0435111971325 96% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0452961672474 0.0277247811725 163% => OK
Prepositions: 0.142857142857 0.128828473217 111% => OK
Participles: 0.0348432055749 0.0370669169778 94% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.36933327327 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0104529616725 0.0208969081088 50% => OK
Particles: 0.00348432055749 0.00154638098197 225% => OK
Determiners: 0.121951219512 0.128158765124 95% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0209059233449 0.0158828679856 132% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.01393728223 0.0114777025283 121% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1544.0 1645.83664459 94% => OK
No of words: 258.0 271.125827815 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.98449612403 6.08160592843 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.04852973271 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.364341085271 0.374372842146 97% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.271317829457 0.287516216867 94% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.186046511628 0.187439937562 99% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0891472868217 0.113142543107 79% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36933327327 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542635658915 0.539623497131 101% => OK
Word variations: 53.1690141114 53.8517498576 99% => OK
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0529801325 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.8461538462 21.7502111507 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5103535611 49.3711431718 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.769230769 132.220823453 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8461538462 21.7502111507 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.923076923077 0.878197800319 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.39072847682 59% => OK
Readability: 46.9779367919 50.5018328374 93% => OK
Elegance: 1.78571428571 1.90840788429 94% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.684684301185 0.549887131256 125% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.128253696192 0.142949733639 90% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.079298989412 0.0787303798458 101% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.589908976297 0.631733273073 93% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.12624155154 0.139662658121 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.302317839243 0.266732575781 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.1124013523 0.103435571967 109% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.376783064288 0.414875509568 91% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.00843951848667 0.0530846634433 16% => Paragraphs are so close to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.484267891054 0.40443939384 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0711928518657 0.0528353158467 135% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.26048565121 70% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 3.49668874172 172% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.62251655629 110% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.1766004415 94% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 10.2958057395 126% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.