tpo3
The reading passage claims that one painting which is known as attributed to Rembrandt could not be a work by him. However, the professor finds all the ideas implausible and presents some evidence to refute them all.
First, the author holds the view that there is something unusual about the dress of the woman because some parts of the clothes are irrelevant with some other parts. In contrast, the lecturer brings up the idea that there is a fur collar in the painting which was not a part of original painting. Somebody has added the fur collar to the painting about a hundred years after/later in order to make it more valuable. Adding the fur collar made the inconsistency in the dress of the woman and it is not what the original painted painter illustrated.
Second, the reading argues that the painter was professional in painting light and shadows but there is an error in this field in the painting. On the contrary, the professor highlights the fact that this is not the painter's mistake. The person who added the fur collar removed the original painting colour in order to add the fur collar and then paint it with simple colours. That is why the face's light is eliminated. This explanation is the most realistic one.
Finally, the reading passage asserts that the panel of the painting reveals that it cannot be one of Rembrandt works. Conversely, the speaker dismisses this issue due to the fact that the person who added the fur collar to the painting must have added some wooden parts to the panel in order to enlarge it and make it more valuable. It seems that the original painting was done on a panel made of single pieces of wood. Moreover, the examination of the panel disclosed that the original wooden part is from the very same tree as panels of other painting by the painter.
- 1.Some people believe that our ever-increasing use of technology significantly reduces our opportunities for human interaction. Other people believe that technology provides us with new and better ways to communicate and connect with one another.Write a r 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave. 73
- Claim: Colleges and universities should specify all required courses and eliminate elective courses in order to provide clear guidance for students.Reason: College students — like people in general — prefer to follow directions rather than make their 79
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts. 62
- tpo15 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 84, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... is something unusual about the dress of the woman because some parts of the clot...
^^
Line 3, column 332, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nting. Somebody has added the fur collar to the painting about a hundred years af...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'conversely', 'finally', 'first', 'however', 'moreover', 'second', 'so', 'then', 'in contrast', 'on the contrary']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.239067055394 0.261695866417 91% => OK
Verbs: 0.151603498542 0.158904122519 95% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0787172011662 0.0723426182421 109% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0437317784257 0.0435111971325 101% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0262390670554 0.0277247811725 95% => OK
Prepositions: 0.119533527697 0.128828473217 93% => OK
Participles: 0.0291545189504 0.0370669169778 79% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.43507694918 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0262390670554 0.0208969081088 126% => OK
Particles: 0.00291545189504 0.00154638098197 189% => OK
Determiners: 0.180758017493 0.128158765124 141% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00874635568513 0.0158828679856 55% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0174927113703 0.0114777025283 152% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1811.0 1645.83664459 110% => OK
No of words: 319.0 271.125827815 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.67711598746 6.08160592843 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.04852973271 104% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.297805642633 0.374372842146 80% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.219435736677 0.287516216867 76% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.15987460815 0.187439937562 85% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0846394984326 0.113142543107 75% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43507694918 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.451410658307 0.539623497131 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 44.6087495189 53.8517498576 83% => OK
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0529801325 115% => OK
Sentence length: 21.2666666667 21.7502111507 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9529975671 49.3711431718 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.733333333 132.220823453 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2666666667 21.7502111507 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.733333333333 0.878197800319 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.39072847682 59% => OK
Readability: 43.2102403344 50.5018328374 86% => OK
Elegance: 1.75 1.90840788429 92% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.549887131256 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.150497091284 0.142949733639 105% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0591802786952 0.0787303798458 75% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.673897825678 0.631733273073 107% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.0940771268411 0.139662658121 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.266732575781 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.103435571967 0% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.557977552847 0.414875509568 134% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.157584585864 0.0530846634433 297% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.40443939384 0% => The content is off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0528353158467 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.26048565121 141% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 3.49668874172 172% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.62251655629 83% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 3.1766004415 126% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 10.2958057395 126% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.