TPO41
The reading specifies that there are three arguments about new regulation which is unnecessary. However, the professor provide there reasons that it is essential and refutes each of author's arguments.
First, power company represent that effective environmental regulation exits today and it is adequate. Nevertheles, the professor dismisses author's reasoning that you only to add liner special material when you want to build company in new pond or landfill and it is not necessary to add liner in the company which builded and this caused significant damaged in the past. For example, coal ash leaked in the water and polluted drink water in the past.
Second, base on the reading, some analysts believe adding very strict rules for storing and handling coal are going to discourage company to recycle it. In contrast, the lecturer states that creating restrict rule is not means that it discourage the recycling and in the past this was done for mercury which was very hazardous and this never affect the recycling of it.
Third, according to the reading, creating new and stricter regulation are going to improve in disposal and handling costs for the power companies and general public would not welcome it. On the contrary, professor believe that it is true that cost of power are going to increase because of strict new regulations but we have to consider the result of it. When we consider the result and the cost we find out it worthy to do it and the costs are not many different to pay in bill.
Therefore, the specific points mentioned in the reading do not make sense.
- TPO 32 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much moreeffectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. 73
- TPO 6 Life today is easier and more comfortable than it was when your grandparents were children 60
- TPO 16 70
- Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 152, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...dling costs for the power companies and general public would not welcome it. On the contrary, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 405, Rule ID: CONFUSION_OF_OUR_OUT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'our'?
Suggestion: our
...onsider the result and the cost we find out it worthy to do it and the costs are no...
^^^
Line 4, column 450, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...t worthy to do it and the costs are not many different to pay in bill. Therefore, the specifi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, third, for example, in contrast, it is true, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 7.30242825607 205% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1318.0 1373.03311258 96% => OK
No of words: 268.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91791044776 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55728531368 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507462686567 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 411.3 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.9149828703 49.2860985944 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.818181818 110.228320801 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3636363636 21.698381199 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.81818181818 7.06452816374 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.380473818052 0.272083759551 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128235071361 0.0996497079465 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0844128572722 0.0662205650399 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156631344777 0.162205337803 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0953565554786 0.0443174109184 215% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.3589403974 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.