tpo42
Both reading and listening parts offer two opposite views about the provided solutions to prevent glass injuries to birds. While the passage lists three possible solutions for declining these harms; the professor, on the other hand, casts doubt on the accuracy of these solutions and provide some clues to call them into the question.
First of all, the article mentions the one-way glass as a possible responsible solution. According to the text, one-way glass while is translucent from inside is blocked from outside; thus, the birds will consider them as a solid barrier. On the other hand, the lecturer refutes this solution; as he explains, the one-way glass works as the mirror which as hazards as the transparent glasses. As he describes, the birds cannot distinguish the mirror; furthermore, since the mirror reflect the surrounding, birds assume the reflection as the sky and nature and fly through the glass. Therefore, the one-way glass cannot solve harms of accidents with glasses.
Secondly, the text provides the colorful design on glasses as another alternative to hamper these accidents and their injuries, in which some painting such as stripes cover a part of the glass. In this case, while the glass provides sights from inside, the paint will be considered as the barrier from outside. On the contrary, the instructor rejects the accuracy of this solution too. As he claims, since there is some transparent opening between the paintings, birds consider the glass as a wall with small openings, which birds get eager to fly right to. To prevent this event, the opening should be so tiny, in which the inside light would be blocked by the big painting and make the inside darker. So, the colorful design would not stop this hazard too.
Finally, meanwhile, the passage offers the magnetic field as the possible guiding solution for birds to coordinates their flight, the professor, on the other hand, refutes the feasibility of this solution too. Based on his assertation, although birds use the magnetic field during their flight, this usage is merely for long-distance flight, such as migration from a cold region to the warm one. Furthermore, for the short journey, birds use their eyes and brightness of the light. Consequently, the use of a magnetic field for short-distance flight in the city and the prevention of accidents with glasses will be useless.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-10 | KimiaKermanshahian | 80 | view |
| 2022-04-20 | lhklin | 70 | view |
| 2021-10-25 | DarkSaitama | 70 | view |
| 2021-09-21 | Maryam_zn | 70 | view |
| 2021-04-22 | incoco | 80 | view |
- 23 Governments should offer college and university education free of charge to all students Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In dev 64
- Tpo-extra writing 3 3
- tpo 7.1. 86
- tpo33 75
- Educators should teach facts only after their students have studied the ideas, trends, and concepts that help explain those facts. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... clues to call them into the question. First of all, the article mentions the o...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...solve harms of accidents with glasses. Secondly, the text provides the colorful...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...design would not stop this hazard too. Finally, meanwhile, the passage offers t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, first, furthermore, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, such as, first of all, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 12.0772626932 33% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 30.3222958057 175% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2019.0 1373.03311258 147% => OK
No of words: 392.0 270.72406181 145% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15051020408 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.04702891845 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7610468271 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 145.348785872 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.479591836735 0.540411800872 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 585.9 419.366225166 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 15.0 8.23620309051 182% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 1.25165562914 639% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 2.5761589404 427% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7892444021 49.2860985944 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.764705882 110.228320801 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0588235294 21.698381199 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.58823529412 7.06452816374 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.4336716484 0.272083759551 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141861345081 0.0996497079465 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0534771234355 0.0662205650399 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.246836603231 0.162205337803 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0804745415383 0.0443174109184 182% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.3589403974 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 63.6247240618 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.