TPO44: the silver coin which is founded in US is genuine evidence or the fake one?
The reading and the lecture are both about European silver coin which is dating to eleventh century and was found in archaeological sites in the state of Maine in the United States. The author of the reading asserts three reasons which prove that the coins were fake. However, the lecturer challenges the reading reasons and claim that the coins can be genuine.
First of all, the author argues that there is a long distance between Norse settlement and archeological site in which coins were found. The article mentions that Norse settlement was in eastern Canada while the coin sites are located in North America and there is a great distance between them. On the contrary, the lecturer believes that the Norse were interested in obtaining objects during their travels. Additionally, he says that they travel from faraway places but gathering different objects which have historical explanations behind them. The Norse carry all these objects with them during their movement. So, it is possible for them to collect coins from somewhere different to their settlement and bring them to North America.
Secondly, the writer suggests that they couldn't find any other coins in the Canadian site which is the Norse settlement. In the article, it is said that Norse didn't have any coins to bring them to North America. Conversely, the speaker is of the opinion that the Norse didn't have a permanent settlement in North America. He elaborates on this by bringing up the point that the Norse travel to Europe several times and during these travels they picked all coins and took back to Europe. So, the Norse can bring all coins to North America and took them back to Europe.
Finally, the author posits that the coins didn't worth as much as today. Moreover, it is stated in the article that The North Americans were not familiar with the value of silver coins and they were not interested in coins. In contrast, the professor underlines the fact that silver coins were appealing and beautiful enough to attract their attention. He notes that North Americans could use silver as a necklace or jewelry. Also, the Norse could use them for trade with North Americans.
- TPO42Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when do similar tasks all day long. 66
- TPO44 independentSome people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Others believe that it is best to use that time doing things together tha 70
- TPO42 Integrated Writing 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. Use specific reasons and examples to suppo 60
- TPO44: the silver coin which is founded in US is genuine evidence or the fake one? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 41, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...Secondly, the writer suggests that they couldnt find any other coins in the Canadian si...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 161, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
.... In the article, it is said that Norse didnt have any coins to bring them to North ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 272, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...peaker is of the opinion that the Norse didnt have a permanent settlement in North A...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 43, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...nally, the author posits that the coins didnt worth as much as today. Moreover, it is...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, finally, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, as to, in contrast, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.4613686534 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 12.0772626932 157% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 22.412803532 174% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 30.3222958057 148% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1871.0 1373.03311258 136% => OK
No of words: 366.0 270.72406181 135% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11202185792 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61704281125 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 145.348785872 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491803278689 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 550.8 419.366225166 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 13.0 8.23620309051 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.641466629 49.2860985944 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.058823529 110.228320801 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5294117647 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.23529411765 7.06452816374 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.51018484319 0.272083759551 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.182568580509 0.0996497079465 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0855607365306 0.0662205650399 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.314590807169 0.162205337803 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0465442142524 0.0443174109184 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 63.6247240618 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.