tpo48
In this set of material the reading states that many frog species have declined in the world because of changes in their environment. Since the frogs play a crucial role in humans' life in a spread spectrum by eating harmful insects, so the reading brings three solutions for preventing from this reduction, however the lecture finds all solutions vain. The information the professor provides contradicts the fact outlined in the reading passage.
First of all, the reading contends that the used pesticides in farmlands of near of neighboring frog habitats have increased by farmers in the recent years. These pesticides can have a horrible effect on frogs' bodies and they are able to kill the frogs, consequently farmers should not use the pesticides in their farmlands near of the frogs’ habitats, in contrast the lecture declares that not to use the pesticides is not economical and practical, because it can strike to farmers. For instance they will lose more crops and will not be able to compete with other farmers in other areas.
Second, the author of readings proposes that the fungus has recently raised up in the world and it causes frogs' skins to become thick, so the frogs will not be attract water and they will become dehydrate and finally die. The frogs should be treated from this infection, on the contrary the professor expresses that every frog has to treat individually, but in every spring the frogs pass on the fungus and new generation will be infected again; hence this procedure is very expensive and long.
Third, the reading claims that natural habitats like wetlands where the frog population lays their eggs are threatened. If humans protect these areas, the frogs will be able to boost their population or at least maintain it; conversely the professor refutes this solution and believes that it cannot save the frogs. The most important reason for ruining wetlands is global warming, subsequently protecting from the wetlands will not be effective.
- A university has money in its budget to do one thing to improve its facilities for students It can either improve the quality of the technology for example computers and printers that it provides for students Or it can redesign spaces where students hold 93
- Do you agree or disagree?successful people try new things and take risk than only doing what they already know how to do well. 82
- tpo18 85
- Tpo15 85
- tpo30 80
Comments
Essay evaluation report
flaws:
No. of Words: 329 250
Write the essay in 20 minutes. Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
---------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 24 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 11 12
No. of Words: 329 250
No. of Characters: 1622 1200
No. of Different Words: 171 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.259 4.2
Average Word Length: 4.93 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.491 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 114 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 89 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 60 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 36 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 29.909 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 12.595 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.727 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.379 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.632 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.081 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 209, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...water and they will become dehydrate and finally die. The frogs should be treated...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'consequently', 'conversely', 'finally', 'first', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'second', 'so', 'third', 'as to', 'at least', 'for instance', 'in contrast', 'first of all', 'on the contrary']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.25069637883 0.261695866417 96% => OK
Verbs: 0.155988857939 0.158904122519 98% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0779944289694 0.0723426182421 108% => OK
Adverbs: 0.050139275766 0.0435111971325 115% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0306406685237 0.0277247811725 111% => OK
Prepositions: 0.136490250696 0.128828473217 106% => OK
Participles: 0.033426183844 0.0370669169778 90% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.57339308576 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0194986072423 0.0208969081088 93% => OK
Particles: 0.00278551532033 0.00154638098197 180% => OK
Determiners: 0.128133704735 0.128158765124 100% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.033426183844 0.0158828679856 210% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00278551532033 0.0114777025283 24% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1994.0 1645.83664459 121% => OK
No of words: 329.0 271.125827815 121% => OK
Chars per words: 6.06079027356 6.08160592843 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.04852973271 105% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.373860182371 0.374372842146 100% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.276595744681 0.287516216867 96% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.197568389058 0.187439937562 105% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.115501519757 0.113142543107 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57339308576 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 145.348785872 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531914893617 0.539623497131 99% => OK
Word variations: 56.0649383226 53.8517498576 104% => OK
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0529801325 84% => OK
Sentence length: 29.9090909091 21.7502111507 138% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.9057004143 49.3711431718 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 181.272727273 132.220823453 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.9090909091 21.7502111507 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.54545454545 0.878197800319 176% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.39072847682 29% => OK
Readability: 57.5686653772 50.5018328374 114% => OK
Elegance: 1.77647058824 1.90840788429 93% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.578111636521 0.549887131256 105% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.179385155154 0.142949733639 125% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0724676067981 0.0787303798458 92% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.684802538005 0.631733273073 108% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.130385911099 0.139662658121 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.284580148775 0.266732575781 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0916981567444 0.103435571967 89% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.442617842169 0.414875509568 107% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0183166122398 0.0530846634433 35% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.409805466627 0.40443939384 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0512221143968 0.0528353158467 97% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.26048565121 23% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 4.0 3.49668874172 114% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.62251655629 138% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 3.1766004415 31% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 10.2958057395 97% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.