TPO49
The main idea of both the lecture and the passage is whether 200 -million-years-old fossil structures, which were discovered in the state of Arizona, had been bee nests or not. Considering this, the author mentions some arguments that rejects bees existed on earth 200 million years ago. The professor, on the other hand, unequivocally challenges whatever contended in the reading by citing three reasons.
First, both the professor and the author talk about fossil remains of bees. As claimed by the passage, the oldest bee fossil belonged to100 millions years ago. therefore, it is implausible that fossil structures had been bee nests. The lecture, nevertheless, contradicts the author's view and explains that as early as 200 years ago trees with special sticky material were not exist on earth so that bodies of bees could not persevere. also, finding no bee fossil is not enough reason for ruling out that bees lived on earth 200 million years ago.
Second of all, the passage goes on to mentions that flowers which bees feed on existed on earth about 125 million years ago. therefore, it might not bees lived on earth before that time because they didn't have any nutrients to eat. In contrast, the professor explains that bees were able to feed on non-flower plants such as pine trees, which existed 200 million years ago. also, the professor mentions that bees might have adapted to feed on flower plants later.
The last point discussed in the passage is that discovered structures lack some details of modern-day bee nests. However, the professor rejects this by declaring that modern-day bees use some waterproof material. Chemical evidence of fossil structures consists of the same materials which may be strong validation for existence bees 200 million years ago.
- TPO-52-integrated-writing 76
- TPO 43 80
- Tpo 49 83
- TPO49 81
- Students of a university have a long break between university semesters; the university requires all students to do one of the following for one month during the break:1. Students must take a course on the subject that has no direct connection to their ma 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 215, column 161, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
...ssil belonged to100 millions years ago. therefore, it is implausible that fossil structur...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 215, column 377, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'existed'.
Suggestion: existed
...s with special sticky material were not exist on earth so that bodies of bees could n...
^^^^^
Line 215, column 436, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Also
...hat bodies of bees could not persevere. also, finding no bee fossil is not enough re...
^^^^
Line 269, column 126, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
...d on earth about 125 million years ago. therefore, it might not bees lived on earth befor...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 269, column 200, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
... on earth before that time because they didnt have any nutrients to eat. In contrast,...
^^^^^
Line 269, column 376, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Also
..., which existed 200 million years ago. also, the professor mentions that bees might...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, may, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, in contrast, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1916.0 1373.03311258 140% => OK
No of words: 292.0 270.72406181 108% => OK
Chars per words: 6.56164383562 5.08290768461 129% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57988114706 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 145.348785872 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506849315068 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 432.9 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9574980035 49.2860985944 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.733333333 110.228320801 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4666666667 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.86666666667 7.06452816374 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0627772399189 0.272083759551 23% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0279458378109 0.0996497079465 28% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0214086786672 0.0662205650399 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0470176516602 0.162205337803 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0176046563235 0.0443174109184 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.2 13.3589403974 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 20.77 12.2367328918 170% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.