Both the reading and the lecture are about banning unhealthy behavior like smoking cigarettes and high taxes related to these behaviors. The author in the reading asserts that high taxes not only and avoid increasing this behavior, but also have some benefits for all of us, and provides three reasons for support. The professor in the lecture, however, contends that the reasons are not convincing, and casts doubt on each of the reasons which are mentioned in the passage.
First, the reading argues that high taxes can discourage people who show this kind of unhealthy behavior. On the contrary, the lecturer holds the view that this method will not lead to cut off unhealthy behaviors, and people who spend higher taxes will buy cheaper cigarettes which have more harmful materials for them. Besides, by doing so, it will increase the risk of disease among them. Also, they have less money for buying other things which are useful for them like healthy food.
Moreover, the passage declares that high taxes is totally fair because these people acting negative behaviors, increase medicine cost for governments. On the other hand, the professor in the lecture dismisses this assertion and adds some people think this method is unfair. They believe that people who suffer from smoking and other bad behaviors have higher incomes or lower incomes. By increasing taxes the second group who have less salary will damage, and it has some negative influenced on their lives. So, he thinks it is unfair for them. Besides, the other group will not change their behavior.
Finally, the author in the reading claims that high taxes might increase the government's incomes and it can allocate more budget for building some useful places for citizens. Conversely, the lecturer refutes this idea and says higher taxes will increase the dependency of government on this kind of taxes and they will not try to avoid this behavior. Hence, they should not only take care of the negative effects of these behaviors but also build healthy places for people.
- TOPIC: Imagine that you plan to donate money to charity to help people in need. If you could give money toonly one type of charitable organization, which one of the following would you choose and why?- An organization that provides food and housing to peo 70
- TPO 33 #1 70
- Tpo 32 integrated 80
- TPO53Independent Task-Many countries require cigarette smokers to pay particularly high taxes on their purchases of cigarettes; similar taxes are being considered for unhealthy foods. The policy of imposing high taxes on cigarettes and other unhealthy pro 73
- TPO 23 integrated essay 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Both the reading and the lecture are abo...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s which are mentioned in the passage. First, the reading argues that high taxe...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... group will not change their behavior. Finally, the author in the reading claim...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, conversely, finally, first, hence, however, moreover, second, so, kind of, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 7.30242825607 205% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 22.412803532 152% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1705.0 1373.03311258 124% => OK
No of words: 339.0 270.72406181 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02949852507 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27591778781 2.5805825403 88% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 145.348785872 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.480825958702 0.540411800872 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 522.0 419.366225166 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.51434878587 330% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4218092603 49.2860985944 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.5625 110.228320801 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1875 21.698381199 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0625 7.06452816374 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222007650828 0.272083759551 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0836967555926 0.0996497079465 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0653864185413 0.0662205650399 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157953114677 0.162205337803 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0264282892026 0.0443174109184 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.