Tpo6-W1
The article criticizes that the online encyclopedias will never be as valuable as traditional printed encyclopedias. However, the professor in the lecture disagrees with this opinion and she disputes all the three points raised by the article.
Firstly, the article claims that the communal encyclopedia are not as accurate as those printed ones since the contributors are not experts. But the professor points out that neither the online encyclopedias nor the traditional ones can be perfectly accurate. Moreover, compared with the printed books, it’s easier to correct the online errors and factual materials in online version. As a result, the online encyclopedias are actually superior than the traditional ones.
Secondly, the article thinks that those online texts are facing the risk of destructive editing. The professor agrees with this point, but she explains that the communal encyclopedias do have some defensive strategies. For instance, the indisputable facts in the encyclopedia are always presented in read-only format that no one can change. Besides, the community also have some special editors to monitor changes and change back the changes. Thus this is not a critical flaw of online encyclopedias.
Thirdly, the article proposes that the topics of online encyclopedias are too trivial in that it only focuses on something popular, not something important. Nevertheless, the professor refutes that. The fact that the traditional encyclopedia only focuses on certain topics is actually a result of their limited space. The online database has almost no storage limit, so they don't need to concern about restricted topics, which makes them better able to reflect the exact interest of the public.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-06-23 | Angelina2016 | 3 | view |
| 2018-06-23 | Angelina2016 | 3 | view |
- A D People often buy products not because they really need them but because other people have them 90
- Do you agree or disagree that parents should not express their disagreement to the teacher if parents find the teaching method is not right? 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: Universities should require every graduation students to take public speaking courses. Give specific examples and details to support your answer. 76
- 47-W2 3
- TPO32 Integrate writing 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 451, Rule ID: SUPERIOR_THAN[1]
Message: The adjective superior is normally used with 'to'.
Suggestion: to
...ine encyclopedias are actually superior than the traditional ones. Secondly, the ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 444, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...or changes and change back the changes. Thus this is not a critical flaw of online e...
^^^^
Line 7, column 376, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...se has almost no storage limit, so they dont need to concern about restricted topics...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, but, first, firstly, however, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, thus, for instance, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1464.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 265.0 270.72406181 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52452830189 5.08290768461 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92428726943 2.5805825403 113% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 145.348785872 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569811320755 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 419.366225166 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.55342163355 116% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.304387432 49.2860985944 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.6 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6666666667 21.698381199 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.86666666667 7.06452816374 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 53.8541721854 69% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.44 12.2367328918 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 63.6247240618 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.