Both the reading and the lecture are talking about why the transient lunar phenomenon happens, the reading passage that there are three possible explanations, but the speaker disagrees with the perspective made in the reading.
The reading first claims that the TLP is a mistaken observation which the objects always near the field of the telescope. So, the TLP is not associated with the Moon itself. However, the speaker says that the TLP doesn’t appear randomly, but is discovered in two certain locations. That is why the opinion of the reading is challenged.
Furthermore, the reading conceives that the TLP is a color or change from the numerous high speed collisions of the meteors. On the contrary, the speaker asserts that the light from the meteor is often shining in few seconds. However, the TLP persists in almost twenty minutes, which is differs the reading as well.
Finally, the reading mentions that the TLP may the light reflected from the sun by the rock which can be found in the earth, while the speaker in the listening material, maintains that it is actually hard to figure out because of the moon reflecting light from the sun is brighter than the rock does. Thus, reading passage has been contradicted again. Therefore, the speaker departs totally from opinions on the topic made in the reading.
- Transient lunar phenomena TLP are relatively brief flashes of light that appear to come from the surface of the Moon Such flashes of light have been observed for centuries by both amateur and professional astronomers and several theories have been put for 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement For any business to be successful it must spend a lot of money on advertising 93
- Transient lunar phenomena TLP are relatively brief flashes of light that appear to come from the surface of the Moon Such flashes of light have been observed for centuries by both amateur and professional astronomers and several theories have been put for 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, thus, well, while, talking about, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 22.412803532 45% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1109.0 1373.03311258 81% => OK
No of words: 223.0 270.72406181 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9730941704 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57666928365 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 145.348785872 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538116591928 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 315.0 419.366225166 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.119068826 49.2860985944 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.818181818 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2727272727 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.1818181818 7.06452816374 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143128066698 0.272083759551 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0527291918598 0.0996497079465 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0277286788189 0.0662205650399 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0851642621306 0.162205337803 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0246028281506 0.0443174109184 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 53.8541721854 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 63.6247240618 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.