using regular glass has bird's injury. what is your opinion?
The reading and listening passages have conflicting opinion about solution of preventing bird's injuries because of implement of glass material in buildings. The writer providing three reasons, on the other hand, the lecture categorically refutes all them citing the none of the solution will effectively stop this problem.
First, the reading states that by replacing one-way glass with instead of regular glass birds can detect solid barrier and won't try to fly. On the contrary, the lecturer believes in one-way glass reflect the images and they are just like mirror and birds also don't understand the mirror like as regular glass. If put a picture of sky or river they assume they're real and fly in to them.
Moreover, the second solution in the reading is using colorful lines or other designs on clear glass to prevent birds to fly through them. The author points out these lines perceive as open halls, and birds try to fly to them. To avoid this openings would be very small, but then, the room would be too dark.
Finally, the third one that passage implies, is if the buildings appointed to magnetic it could help birds to get away from buildings. Birds use this methods when travel long distance to figure out which way should fly. For short distance they apply eyes and brightness of light. So using magnetic field won’t have much effect on birds.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-20 | talelaldabous | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-05 | NIMA SAEEDI | 81 | view |
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they respond to the specific concerns presented in the reading passage. Remove Salinity from The Salton Sea 80
- Summarize the points made in the lecture. Being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage. Fires in Yellowstone park 80
- Do you agree or disagree?It is better to relax by watching a movie or reading a book than doing physical exercise 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better for children to grow up in the countryside than in a large city. Use specific reasons and examples to develop your essay 73
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they respond to the specific points made in the reading passage. theories have been proposed to explain the origin of the Voynich manuscript 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 261, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...hey are just like mirror and birds also dont understand the mirror like as regular g...
^^^^
Line 3, column 356, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: they're
...t a picture of sky or river they assume theyre real and fly in to them. Moreover, th...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 237, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... and birds try to fly to them. To avoid this openings would be very small, but then...
^^^^
Line 5, column 241, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... birds try to fly to them. To avoid this openings would be very small, but then, ...
^^
Line 7, column 146, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...s to get away from buildings. Birds use this methods when travel long distance to fi...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, moreover, second, so, then, third, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 12.0772626932 33% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1140.0 1373.03311258 83% => OK
No of words: 233.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89270386266 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31168376247 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 145.348785872 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630901287554 0.540411800872 117% => OK
syllable_count: 335.7 419.366225166 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6810198122 49.2860985944 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.0 110.228320801 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4166666667 21.698381199 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06452816374 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219834046995 0.272083759551 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0725553978199 0.0996497079465 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0649959193985 0.0662205650399 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120323880781 0.162205337803 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0379988868743 0.0443174109184 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 53.8541721854 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.0289183223 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 63.6247240618 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.