work week
Both the reading and the lecture discuss whether the 4 days work week will beneficial to the company as well as the employee as a whole. The former argues that this will have a great impact on the company and individual in three specific ways but the latter counters each of the points made by the reading.
First of all, the reading contends that a reduced workweek would increase the benefit of the company as they have to pay only the 80% of the full-time employee and also hire more employees and this will create an overall less amount of error to the output of the company. In contrast, the lecturer argues that 4 days workweek require more investment of the company as the health cost is needed for more employee. Moreover, the training for the extra new employee will also add extra cost and will cut off the profit of the company.
Secondly, the author contends that this 4-days workweek will decrease the unemployment rate of the country since more and more people will be required to fill the other days for the company. However, the lecture rebuts that, this may not work since the company may offer overtime for the existing employee. Moreover, the situation can be even worse by raising the unemployment rate since the company will likely to hire those people who want to work 5 days.
Finally, the text claims that the 4-days workweek will enhance the life quality of the employee since they can spend more time with their family and can do their own interest. On the other hand, the listening counters that, while the employee will get more time for leisure, this reduces the life quality of the people since the job market become more unstable and if a sudden economic crash happens, the 4-days worker will likely to lose their job first. He further adds that the company will continuously be looking for 5 days workers for their important position like managing director to have continuous and consistent discussion making for the company.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-06 | S M Naimul Mamun | 73 | view |
| 2021-09-13 | cc919 | 88 | view |
| 2021-09-13 | cc919 | 76 | view |
| 2021-07-31 | talelaldabous | 60 | view |
| 2019-11-26 | JohnSmith96 | 80 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, look, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, while, in contrast, as well as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 5.04856512141 357% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1625.0 1373.03311258 118% => OK
No of words: 342.0 270.72406181 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7514619883 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28489081476 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 145.348785872 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.479532163743 0.540411800872 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 492.3 419.366225166 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 21.2450331126 146% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.2201105344 49.2860985944 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.727272727 110.228320801 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.0909090909 21.698381199 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.8181818182 7.06452816374 196% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0726623712507 0.272083759551 27% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0430787677979 0.0996497079465 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0833536270339 0.0662205650399 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0642502211387 0.162205337803 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0706497313405 0.0443174109184 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.3589403974 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.93 53.8541721854 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 10.7273730684 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.498013245 137% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.2008830022 161% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.