The reading passage and lecturer both talk about economic benefits from offering four - day work week for employee instead of five days. The writer claim several benefits from this offering. The lecturer in the other hand casts doubt on claim made in article. He mentions, the four -day workweek has no benefit.
To begin with, the author states, four-day workweek will increase company profits, as employees feel more comfortable with this plan and finish their work without error. This statement is challenged by professor. He cites. offering four -day workweek need spend more and more cost due to need for new workers . moreover, these new workers need training and medical benefits. In addition, medical benefits are same for five or four - day workweek.
Second, the passage asserts, offering four- day workweek will give chance to hire other workers and decrease unemployment. However, the lecturer refutes this notion. He points out, we can over overtime for employees to encourage them. because, as we said hiring more worker will cost companies more money. Furthermore, the four-days worker already finish their work in four days instead of five.
Finally, the author illustrates, four -day work will give worker more free time to spent it with their families. The professor argues this point. He says, if workers get less amount of salary, this will effect their economic state. In addition. five -day workers have a good chance to be as a manager because, they are available in all week days.
The reading passage and lecturer both talk about of economic benefits from offering four - day work week for employee instead of five days. The writer claim several benefits from this offering. The lecturer in the other hand casts doubt on claim made in article. He mentions, the four -day workweek has no benefit.
To begin with, the author states, four-day workweek will increase company profits, as employees feel more comfortable with this plan and finish their work without error. This statement is challenged by professor. He cites. offering four -day workweek need spend more and more cost due to need for new workers . moreover, these new workers need training and medical benefits. In addition, medical benefits are same for five or four - day workweek.
Second, the passage asserts, offering four- day workweek will give chance to hire other workers and decrease unemployment. However, the lecturer refutes this notion. He points out, we can over overtime for employees to encourage them. because, as we said hiring more worker will cost companies more money. Furthermore, the four-days worker already finish their work in four days instead of five.
Finally, the author illustrates, four -day work will give worker more free time to spent it with their families. The professor argues this point. He says, if workers get less amount of salary, this will effect their economic state. In addition. five -day workers have a good chance to be as a manager because, they are available in all week days.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-31 | talelaldabous | 60 | view |
- Government always fund many parts of sociaty But as we know these funding are limited Since government should has peiorty to suppor which feild that is more important than other Some believe that government should give funds to arts Other think athletics 60
- The reading passage and the lecture are both about the accuracy of Chevalier de seingalt memoreis The critics in the reading passage claim that Chevalier distorted many events in the memoir therefore the author gives three reason to explain hes view Howev 75
- Thr reading passage and the lecture are both talking about using technique called burning mirror by Creek to defense themselves from Roman navy The writer has several reasons to debate thgis story and says it just myth However the lecturer has another opi 76
- The passage and lecture talk about ways to protect Torreya taxifoha which are trees very common in Florida The writer claims three ways to save these plant The leturer casts doubt on claim mde in the article She mentions all ways are not practical Ans she 60
- To days many people interested with traveling to and space discovery the government fund this journy since this travel take alonge time and need a lot of money the question whether government funding to these type of exploration consider waste of money or 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 84, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...about of economic benefits from offering four - day work week for employee instea...
^^
Line 1, column 153, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'claims'.
Suggestion: claims
...ployee instead of five days. The writer claim several benefits from this offering. Th...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 196, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...im several benefits from this offering. The lecturer in the other hand casts doubt ...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the four -day workweek has no benefit. To begin with, the author states, four-d...
^^
Line 2, column 225, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Offering
...t is challenged by professor. He cites. offering four -day workweek need spend more and ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 244, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'workweek' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'workweeks'.
Suggestion: workweeks
...professor. He cites. offering four -day workweek need spend more and more cost due to ne...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 310, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...nd more cost due to need for new workers . moreover, these new workers need traini...
^^
Line 2, column 313, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Moreover
...more cost due to need for new workers . moreover, these new workers need training and me...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 236, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Because
...ertime for employees to encourage them. because, as we said hiring more worker will cos...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 263, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'worker' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: worker
...ourage them. because, as we said hiring more worker will cost companies more money. Further...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 204, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
...rs get less amount of salary, this will effect their economic state. In addition. five...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 236, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...is will effect their economic state. In addition. five -day workers have a good chance t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 246, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Five
...fect their economic state. In addition. five -day workers have a good chance to be a...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, so, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 12.0772626932 0% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1261.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 247.0 270.72406181 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10526315789 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40241545117 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582995951417 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 377.1 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 21.2450331126 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.6485813113 49.2860985944 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 70.0555555556 110.228320801 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.7222222222 21.698381199 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.61111111111 7.06452816374 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 13.0 4.19205298013 310% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 4.33554083885 231% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.456730508074 0.272083759551 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140316441441 0.0996497079465 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.159914512756 0.0662205650399 241% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.338519582422 0.162205337803 209% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.291861015287 0.0443174109184 659% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.3589403974 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 53.8541721854 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.0289183223 65% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 63.6247240618 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.498013245 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.