yellowstone fire is good for the environment or not
The article explains about United States' policy in the late 1960s on natural fires to not be supressed and let them burn themselves out. However, after the 1988 Yellowstone fire, which burned for more than two months and damaged a very vast area, many people requested that the "let it burn" policy has to be replaced with a new policy that natural fires should be extinguished as soon as they start. The lecturer contradicts points made in the essay and expresses that the 'let it burn' policy is fundumentally a good approach to natural fire, as it is not only destructive but also, creative.
firstly, despite large destruction of vegetation in Yellowstone fire, it provided the opportunity for a more diverse vegetation coverage in the area afterwards. Plants that needed more open fields and seeds that required great amount of heat started to grow. secondly, different ecosystem provided by the new plants and conditions after the fire, made it possible for various smaller animals to inhabit the place like rabbits and hares. With the presence of such animals their predators also started to appear and therefore, creating an actually richer food chain.
Finally, the lecturer mentions that natural forest fires like in Yellowstone happen in extreme unsual circumstances and are not likely to occur often, as there has not been such a phenomenon since. evidently, the tourists have been coming back and local businesses and tourism may have not been affected.
In conclusion, natural forest fires can be a part of ecological equilibrium in the environment and the 'let it burn' policy might not be bad idea afterall.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-06 | Seyed Armin Mirhosseini | 85 | view |
| 2021-07-24 | Mahimoon | 3 | view |
| 2021-07-24 | Mahimoon | 3 | view |
| 2020-09-28 | matinmoezzi | 80 | view |
| 2019-12-23 | NIMA SAEEDI | 80 | view |
- TPO 15 integrated Cane toads must be controlled by three methods building a national fence killing them developing a disease causing virus 80
- everyday similar tasks or different 90
- TPO 17 integrated the population of birds is decreasing because of three reasons human populations are expanding agricultural activities are increasing the usage of chemical pesticides are increasing 80
- bee nests 200 million years ago 80
- hail fall and cloud seeding 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Firstly
...only destructive but also, creative. firstly, despite large destruction of vegetatio...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 260, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Secondly
...d great amount of heat started to grow. secondly, different ecosystem provided by the ne...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 525, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rs also started to appear and therefore, creating an actually richer food chain. ...
^^
Line 5, column 139, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'often' is usually put before the verb 'occur'.
Suggestion: often occur
...ual circumstances and are not likely to occur often, as there has not been such a phenomeno...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 199, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Evidently
...e has not been such a phenomenon since. evidently, the tourists have been coming back and...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 145, Rule ID: AFTERALL[1]
Message: Did you mean 'after all'?
Suggestion: after all
...et it burn policy might not be bad idea afterall.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, as to, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1371.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 268.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11567164179 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70271628504 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 145.348785872 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585820895522 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.8769884506 49.2860985944 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.1 110.228320801 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8 21.698381199 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7 7.06452816374 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268131306579 0.272083759551 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0887953240538 0.0996497079465 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0673823670784 0.0662205650399 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13429115258 0.162205337803 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0407057336589 0.0443174109184 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.3589403974 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 53.8541721854 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.0289183223 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 10.7273730684 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.