Some people claim that public museums and art galleries will not be needed because people can see historical objects and works of art by using a computer. Do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
It is sometimes argued whether the powerful computer science and internet could replace public museums and art galleries. I believe new technologies could only work as supplements as appose to replacements.
I believe people who would like to appreciate historical objects and art works online usually find it is convenient to do so. Firstly, one can search for an object by just typing a few characters, and the result would come out automatically. Secondly, unlike museums and art galleries whose opening hours are fixed, people can access the information online at anytime they want. Thirdly, w...
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-11-25 | Amin Amiri | 95 | view |
| 2018-11-25 | Amin Amiri | 73 | view |
- A tendency of news reported in the media about problems and emergencies rather than positive developments is more harmful to the individual and to society Do you agree or disagree 67
- Some people claim that public museums and art galleries will not be needed because people can see historical objects and works of art by using a computer Do you agree or disagree with this opinion 90
- Some people think planning future is a waste of time and people should focus on the present To what extent do you agree or disagree 72
Sentence: I believe new technologies could only work as supplements as appose to replacements.
Description: A conjunction, subordinating is not usually followed by a verb, base: uninflected present, imperative or infinitive
Suggestion: Refer to as and appose
Sentence: In conclusion, my view is that new computer technologies are not substitutive for public museum and art galleries.
Error: substitutive Suggestion: No alternate word
flaws:
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.833 0.12
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.0 out of 9
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 12 15
No. of Words: 277 350
No. of Characters: 1347 1500
No. of Different Words: 154 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.08 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.863 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.68 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 104 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 78 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 49 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 31 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 23.083 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.722 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.833 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.381 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.599 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.069 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5